Talk:List of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Umm Qirfa

Why is Umm Qirfa not mentioned? --Mahomet (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2013 (PDT)

Should this be added? We missed responding to this. We probably can. --Axius (talk) 03:03, 27 February 2014 (PST)
I don't think it should be added. At least not until someone redoes the Umm Qirfa page and tackles the criticism. Otherwise it would simply lower the integrity of this page. --Sahab (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2014 (PST)


Sorry the translation is taking forever! I've been busy studying for exams, but it's about 50% done now. Just letting you know I haven't forgot! LawrenceGilmore (talk) 20:35, 26 February 2014 (PST)

Ok thanks. --Axius (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2014 (PST)
I have complete the names and reasons. Am I permitted to trim or extend descriptions for the purpose of readability?

LawrenceGilmore (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2014 (PST)

Hi Lawrence. Nice to hear of your progression with this. If you mean the text, then no. Translations should remain absolutely faithful to the original English work. --Sahab (talk) 09:03, 3 March 2014 (PST)

Saved Comments

This question and answer was posted at the Skeptics Stack Exchange:


I'd like to know to what extend this list is trustable:

Saying: are the sources credible and backed up with solid information? And if not, are there any other sources for the listed claims that are?

Which (if not all) of these claims are most likely to be true?


The earliest biography of Muhammad was written about 100 years after his death, so any historicism is on slightly shaky grounds. None of these stories would be accepted by all Muslims -- there is a lot of room for plausible deniability. I don't think this question is answerable in the form "did Muhammad really do this" or "would all Muslims agree that Muhammad did this?"

But the real question you're wondering about is probably more like the following: how many of these deaths were attributed to Muhammad by Muslims soon after his death, for the reasons given in the article?

The answer: all of them.

Where you see the words "Sirat Rasul Allah" on the list of primary sources in this table, this refers to Ibn Ishaq's early biography of Muhammad, which is the source for probably 90% of any biographical information anyone has ever found about Muhammad. Muslims often doubt the historical veracity of the stories in this book: for example, it contains poetry ascribed to people who were not poets, and the Satanic Verses story which many Muslims discount. But non-Muslims should be in a state of doubt about everything said about and attributed to Muhammad, and this "Sirat Rasul Allah" was indeed written by a Muslim, and much of the book has been reused in other biographies.

A typical example of the story behind the WikiIslam article can be found in the Wikipedia article on one of the first deaths named, Abu 'Afak. Ibn Ishaq's "Sirat Rasul Allah" says that Muhammad ordered this killing himself. Another account, by an historian named Al-Waqidi, says that one of Muhammad's followers killed Abu 'Afak on his own initiative.

One can debate endlessly over which of these stories is more plausible. There can be no resolution to that. But did an early Muslim, and an intelligent historical writer, state that Muhammad directly ordered the killing? Yes. So it was within the range of plausibility in the early Muslim community.

Either way, no one claims that anyone was admonished for this murder of a poet.


Note also that the source for many/most of these seems to be the Hadith [not sirat], a collection of accounts (we'd call them 'oral histories') of Mohammed's actions made fairly soon after his death. So they are perhaps roughly analogous to the Christian New Testament.