6,632
edits
Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an (view source)
Revision as of 02:08, 12 November 2020
, 12 November 2020IbnPinker moved page Talk:Pedophilia in the Qur'an to Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an
mNo edit summary |
m (IbnPinker moved page Talk:Pedophilia in the Qur'an to Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 13:58, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | --[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 13:58, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Hi TS. Nice to have you back. I'll sort it out in while. There won't be any need to rearrange anything. I'll have to delete that online one and cite the hard copy on the hadith above it. ATM, we have both there already. It looks like one editor was reading a hard copy and the other the online version. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 17:26, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | :Hi TS. Nice to have you back. I'll sort it out in while. There won't be any need to rearrange anything. I'll have to delete that online one and cite the hard copy on the hadith above it. ATM, we have both there already. It looks like one editor was reading a hard copy and the other the online version. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 17:26, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
::Thanks. I think perhaps a picture of page 57 could contribute. And perhaps (but this is just a suggestion) the clear attempt to hide the meaning by corrupting the hadith, might be something we would be interested in to expose. Muslims often accuse other religions of having corrupted scripture. Well, since their Sahih Hadith is considered scripture to them and they clearly change around the words and meanings on sahih-bukhari.com and other webistes, like the Quran accuses others of doing, we can expose them for that. [[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 08:12, 13 August 2013 (PDT) | |||
:::For the page's subject matter, the quote as it is will be fine. Their attempt to hide things which they find unpleasant is interesting. If there were more such cases, it would probably make a good standalone article. But here it would be off-topic. I think at most it could be mentioned briefly in a footnote or something, but nothing more. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 14:12, 13 August 2013 (PDT) | |||
::::Thanks. I have something else. I noticed that Al Muslim is not cited here. We know Muslim is usually a copy of Bukhari, as it is in this case. But in this case the error/diversion discussed above is not there. So perhaps Muslim would be a wonderful addition? I apologize for not having the handyness to do it myself at the moment. I plan on learning the Wiki lingo soon. Here is the link to Sahih Muslim in where the chapter titel of Muslim (and therefor of Bukhari) is mentioned: http://www.hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/136-Sahih%20Muslim%20Book%2008.%20Marriage/11407-sahih-muslim-book-008-hadith-number-3311.html | |||
[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 06:56, 16 August 2013 (PDT) | |||
:::::Hi TS. Thanks. It's been added to the page.[[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 11:50, 16 August 2013 (PDT) | |||
:This conversation has been split to [[Talk:Refutation of Modern Apologetics Against Aishas Age]] | |||