Template:Pictorial-Islam-options: Difference between revisions

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 81: Line 81:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam|2=[[File:Jack-1.jpg|230px|link=Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)]]|3=Many news sites carried the story that Michael Jackson had converted to Islam in 2008. This was of course seized upon by Muslims and spread through the blogosphere and user-contributed media sites like Youtube.  
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam|2=[[File:Jack-1.jpg|270px|link=Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)]]|3=Many news sites carried the story that Michael Jackson had converted to Islam in 2008. Muslims then used this for propaganda purposes, spreading it through the blogosphere and user-contributed media sites like Youtube. The source given for this information was usually the New York Post article, however the original source is a notorious tabloid in the UK called "The Sun".


This article refutes all of the proofs that have been offered in support of Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam, thus they must be discarded when researching the claim further. Once this has been done, we are left with nothing. There is absolutely no evidence that Michael Jackson converted to Islam; be it Nation of Islam or otherwise. ([[Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)|''read more'']])}}</option>
This article refutes all of the proofs that have been offered in support of Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam, thus they must be discarded when researching the claim further. Once this has been done, we are left with nothing. There is absolutely no evidence that Michael Jackson converted to Islam; be it Nation of Islam or otherwise. ([[Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)|''read more'']])}}</option>
Line 99: Line 99:
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Pedophilia in the Qur'an|2=[[File:Women protesters.jpg|250px|link=Pedophilia in the Qur'an]]|3=March 23, 2010: Women protesters hold up copies of the Qur'an outside parliament in Sanaa while stating that a proposed law banning marriages under the age of 17 in Yemen is un-Islamic.
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Pedophilia in the Qur'an|2=[[File:Women protesters.jpg|250px|link=Pedophilia in the Qur'an]]|3=March 23, 2010: Women protesters hold up copies of the Qur'an outside parliament in Sanaa while stating that a proposed law banning marriages under the age of 17 in Yemen is un-Islamic.


The Qur'an in verse 33:49 states that no 'Iddah is prescribed for a woman who has not had intimate contact with her husband, but goes on to stipulate the 'Iddah for pre-pubescent girls in verse 65:4, meaning: the holiest text of Islam supports marrying and having sex with prepubescent girls. This is definitive proof that the Qur'an endorses pedophilia, the most abominable of all sexual crimes. ([[Pedophilia in the Qur'an|''read more'']])}}</option>
The Qur'an in verse 33:49 states that no 'Iddah is prescribed for a woman who has not had intimate contact with her husband, but goes on to stipulate the 'Iddah for pre-pubescent girls in verse 65:4, meaning the holiest text of Islam supports marrying and having sex with prepubescent girls. This is definitive proof that the Qur'an endorses pedophilia, something that is considered by many people to be the most serious of all sexual crimes. ([[Pedophilia in the Qur'an|''read more'']])}}</option>





Revision as of 03:11, 20 April 2013

Also see: Template:Pictorial-Islam

Are Judaism and Christianity as Violent as Islam?

File:Image-Judaism Christianity Islam.JPG

"There is far more violence in the Bible than in the Qur'an; the idea that Islam imposed itself by the sword is a Western fiction, fabricated during the time of the crusades when, in fact, it was Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam." This quote sums up the single most influential argument currently serving to deflect the accusation that Islam is inherently violent and intolerant: All monotheistic religions, proponents of such an argument say, and not just Islam, have their fair share of violent and intolerant scriptures, as well as bloody histories. Thus, whenever Islam's sacred scriptures are highlighted as demonstrating the religion's innate bellicosity, the immediate rejoinder is that other scriptures, specifically those of Judeo-Christianity, are as riddled with violent passages. But is that really the case? Does Hebrew violence in the ancient era, and Christian violence in the medieval era compare to, explain away or even legitimize the tenacity of Muslim violence in the modern era? (read more)