WikiIslam:Frequently Asked Questions: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
No it does not. Like the German Wikipedia, all of our pages are under "Pending-changes protection", meaning they are open for editing, but changes will only become visible to readers once they have been reviewed by a user with the appropriate access, known as a "reviewer", or by the administration. WikiIslam prides itself on being an accurate source of information on Islam. There is even a page dedicated to [[WikiIslam:Arguments Not To Use|arguments not to use]] on the website.
No it does not. Like the German Wikipedia, all of our pages are under "Pending-changes protection", meaning they are open for editing, but changes will only become visible to readers once they have been reviewed by a user with the appropriate access, known as a "reviewer", or by the administration. WikiIslam prides itself on being an accurate source of information on Islam. There is even a page dedicated to [[WikiIslam:Arguments Not To Use|arguments not to use]] on the website.


===WikiIslam is only a wiki and seems biased. Why should I trust its contents?===
===Why should I trust WikiIslam's contents?===


WikiIslam's focus on the criticism of Islam does not make it unreliable. The implementation of "Pending-changes protection" eliminates most of the common problems associated with wikis, and we also take great care in providing readers with copious references and footnotes that can be used to independently verify facts.
WikiIslam's focus on the criticism of Islam does not make it unreliable. The implementation of "Pending-changes protection" eliminates most of the common problems associated with wikis, and we also take great care in providing readers with copious references and footnotes that can be used to independently verify facts.
Line 50: Line 50:
==Sources Used==
==Sources Used==


===Does WikiIslam use polemical sources?===
===What sources does WikiIslam permit the usage of?===


No, it does not. Statements of fact concerning Islamic history and theology from polemic sources such as books, articles or commentaries by individuals such as Robert Spencer, Pamela Gellar, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Mark A. Gabriel, Wafa Sultan, Ali Sina, Walid Shoebat, Brigitte Gabriel etc., are not permitted under any circumstances as [[WikiIslam:Reliable Sources|references on WikiIslam]]. Editors are advised to remove any such statements immediately if they come across them.
The wiki relies on Islamic and academic sources which are readily available, either on the net or through retailers. They are the same sources you will see being used and accepted by thousands of Muslim websites. Wherever possible, we link directly to these Muslim websites which, for example, host [{{Compendium-of-muslim-texts-base-url}}/quran/ Qur'an], [{{Compendium-of-muslim-texts-base-url}}/hadith/ Hadith], [http://www.islam-qa.com/en fatwa], [http://bewley.virtualave.net/Risalatitl.html fiqh] and [http://www.theholybook.org/content/section/1/2/ Tafsir] text.


===Does WikiIslam use fabricated sources?===
Statements of fact concerning Islamic history and theology from polemic sources such as books, articles or commentaries by individuals such as Robert Spencer, Pamela Gellar, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Mark A. Gabriel, Wafa Sultan, Ali Sina, Walid Shoebat, Brigitte Gabriel etc., are not permitted under any circumstances as [[WikiIslam:Reliable Sources|references on WikiIslam]]. Editors are advised to remove any such statements immediately if they come across them.


No, it does not. The wiki relies on Islamic and academic sources which are readily available, either on the net or through retailers. They are the same sources you will see being used and accepted by thousands of Muslim websites. Wherever possible, we link directly to these Muslim websites which, for example, host [{{Compendium-of-muslim-texts-base-url}}/quran/ Qur'an], [{{Compendium-of-muslim-texts-base-url}}/hadith/ Hadith], [http://www.islam-qa.com/en fatwa], [http://bewley.virtualave.net/Risalatitl.html fiqh] and [http://www.theholybook.org/content/section/1/2/ Tafsir] text.
===What Qur'an translation does WikiIslam use?===


===What Qur'an translation do you use?===
Unless otherwise stated, we use the respected and widely accepted translations of Yusuf Ali, Marmaduke Pickthal or M. H. Shakir. All Qur'an quotes are taken from the widely referenced [https://quranx.com/About quranx.com] and are properly sourced and linked with the context of three preceding and subsequent verses.


Unless otherwise stated, we use the respected and widely accepted translations of Yusuf Ali, Marmaduke Pickthal or M. H. Shakir. All Qur'an quotes are taken from the University of Southern California Muslim Students Association's [[Compendium of Muslim Texts]] and are properly sourced and linked with the context of three preceding and subsequent verses.
If a misquoted Qur'an verse is brought to the editors' attention, it will be corrected immediately. Most claims of "misquoted Qur'an verses" consist of an apologists using an obscure translation of the Qur'an and pointing out that the translation on the wiki is different from theirs (e.g. see [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmybroadband.co.za%2Fvb%2Fshowthread.php%2F607524-I-am-islamophobic%3Fp%3D12428900%26viewfull%3D1%23post12428900&date=2014-04-07 here]). If someone fails to check the sources, they may assume that it is a misquotation on the part of the editors. However, the wiki's policy is such that it relies on the most widely accepted and established translations of the Qur'an (i.e. Yusuf Ali, Marmaduke Pickthal or M. H. Shakir).


===Does WikiIslam misquote Qur'an verses?===
===What Hadith translations do WikiIslam use?===


No, it does not. If a misquoted Qur'an verse is brought to the editors' attention, it will be corrected immediately. Most claims of "misquoted Qur'an verses" consist of an apologists using an obscure translation of the Qur'an and pointing out that the translation on the wiki is different from theirs (e.g. see [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmybroadband.co.za%2Fvb%2Fshowthread.php%2F607524-I-am-islamophobic%3Fp%3D12428900%26viewfull%3D1%23post12428900&date=2014-04-07 here]). If someone fails to check the sources, they may assume that it is a misquotation on the part of the editors. However, the wiki's policy is such that it relies on the most widely accepted and established translations of the Qur'an (i.e. Yusuf Ali, Marmaduke Pickthal or M. H. Shakir).
All hadith translations are taken from [https://quranx.com/About quranx.com]. If the translation used is produced by the editor or not from quranx.com, this should be brought to the administration's attention, and it will be corrected. Editors are also instructed to make such corrections themselves.


===What Hadith translations do you use?===
===Does WikiIslam permit the use of weak hadiths or allow partial hadiths to be quoted out of context?===
 
All hadith translations are taken from [https://quranx.com/About quranx.com]. Sunnah.com translations may also sometimes be used on occasion (however, these are often the same as those used on quranx.com, and the source linked will always link to the relevant quranx.com page).
 
===Does WikiIslam use weak hadiths or quote partial hadiths out of context?===


No, it does not. The hadith collections used most often at WikiIslam form what is known as the "Authentic Six" i.e. the six canonical hadith collections of mainstream Islam, especially Bukhari and Muslim. Bukhari and Muslim are labeled as entirely authentic (sahih). The others are from Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nasa'i, and Ibn Majah. Malik's Muwatta' is also used and is placed just below the two Sahihs for its reliability, but is not generally included among the six. If possible, when hadith from collections such as Nasa'i and Ibn Majah are quoted, the grading of its authenticity is also provided.  
No, it does not. The hadith collections used most often at WikiIslam form what is known as the "Authentic Six" i.e. the six canonical hadith collections of mainstream Islam, especially Bukhari and Muslim. Bukhari and Muslim are labeled as entirely authentic (sahih). The others are from Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nasa'i, and Ibn Majah. Malik's Muwatta' is also used and is placed just below the two Sahihs for its reliability, but is not generally included among the six. If possible, when hadith from collections such as Nasa'i and Ibn Majah are quoted, the grading of its authenticity is also provided.  
Line 83: Line 79:
No, WikiIslam not in any way related to or endorsed by these organizations. The only commonality is WikiIslam's use of the same [http://www.mediawiki.org Mediawiki] software which is also used by many other wiki websites.
No, WikiIslam not in any way related to or endorsed by these organizations. The only commonality is WikiIslam's use of the same [http://www.mediawiki.org Mediawiki] software which is also used by many other wiki websites.


===Why should I choose WikiIslam over Wikipedia for information critical of Islam?===
===Why should I use WikiIslam over Wikipedia for information on Islam?===


The [http://wikiislam.github.io/wiki/Islam_Science_and_the_Problems_at_Wikipedia.html Jagged 85 incident] is a good example of the problems faced by Wikipedia with respect to Islam-related articles. Jagged 85 was an editor who contributed to 8,115 separate articles with over 67,000 edits made over a period of 5 years until they were caught in 2010. Focusing efforts on improving the image of Islam and downplaying the achievements of the western world, for 5 years he/she was left largely unhindered, misrepresenting sources in various ways, misrepresentations which were then reproduced all over the net by other sites which use Wikipedia as a source.
The [http://wikiislam.github.io/wiki/Islam_Science_and_the_Problems_at_Wikipedia.html Jagged 85 incident] is a good example of the problems faced by Wikipedia with respect to Islam-related articles. Jagged 85 was an editor who contributed to 8,115 separate articles with over 67,000 edits made over a period of 5 years until they were caught in 2010. Focusing efforts on improving the image of Islam and downplaying the achievements of the western world, for 5 years he/she was left largely unhindered, misrepresenting sources in various ways, misrepresentations which were then reproduced all over the net by other sites which use Wikipedia as a source.


Wikipedia's policies have also allowed for the use of some very suspect "reliable" secondary sources. A prime example of this would be Paul Vallely's "[[How Islamic Inventors Did Not Change The World|How Islamic inventors changed the world]]". And they also host a [[List_of_Fabricated_Hadith#Muhammad.27s_Farewell_Sermon|fabricated version of Muhammad's farewell sermon]] which was created by an Indian/Pakistani author in the 80's, simply because the version often features in Islamic propaganda, all while ignoring the authentic version of the sermon found in Tabari.
Wikipedia's policies have also allowed for the use of some very suspect "reliable" secondary sources. A prime example of this would be Paul Vallely's "How Islamic inventors changed the world". And they also host a [[List_of_Fabricated_Hadith#Muhammad.27s_Farewell_Sermon|fabricated version of Muhammad's farewell sermon]] which was created by an Indian/Pakistani author in the 80's, simply because the version often features in Islamic propaganda, all while ignoring the authentic version of the sermon found in Tabari.


As WikiIslam concentrates on only one subject, it hosts fewer articles than Wikipedia. This enables the community to fine-tune the wiki's articles to a much higher standard.
As WikiIslam concentrates on only one subject, it hosts fewer articles than Wikipedia. This enables the community to fine-tune the wiki's articles to a much higher standard.
Line 99: Line 95:
Wikipedia focuses on "[{{Reference archive|1=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth|2=2012-02-10}} verifiability, not truth]". In essence, this means that anyone who falls under Wikipedia's classification of "notable/reliable" can make a statement about any subject, and regardless of its factual accuracy, it can be used in their articles. In regards to Islam, it has meant they accept what "notable/reliable" western commentators and apologists claim about Islamic scriptures and Muslims over what the religious text and Muslims actually say themselves.
Wikipedia focuses on "[{{Reference archive|1=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth|2=2012-02-10}} verifiability, not truth]". In essence, this means that anyone who falls under Wikipedia's classification of "notable/reliable" can make a statement about any subject, and regardless of its factual accuracy, it can be used in their articles. In regards to Islam, it has meant they accept what "notable/reliable" western commentators and apologists claim about Islamic scriptures and Muslims over what the religious text and Muslims actually say themselves.


These commentators who speak about Islam and who fall under Wikipedia's classification of "notable/reliable" tend to be apologists, because serious scholars, for instance [[Videos_on_Islam:_Quran#Bart_Ehrman_Explains_Why_He_Doesn.27t_Criticize_the_Qur.27an|Bart Ehrman]], are scared of violence against themselves or of being accused of bigotry if they criticize anything Islam-related. Thus, Wikipedia often uses notable apologists like Karen Armstrong (who is not a qualified historian or Islamic scholar) whilst ignoring some giant figures from the Islamic world and Islamic history as well as world-renown academic historians and scholars of religion, such as Michael Cook.
These commentators who speak about Islam and who fall under Wikipedia's classification of "notable/reliable" tend to be apologists, because serious scholars, for instance Bart Ehrman, are scared of violence against themselves or of being accused of bigotry if they criticize anything Islam-related. Thus, Wikipedia often uses notable apologists like Karen Armstrong (who is not a qualified historian or Islamic scholar) whilst ignoring some giant figures from the Islamic world and Islamic history as well as world-renown academic historians and scholars of religion, such as Michael Cook.


===What can I find at WikiIslam that I cannot find at Wikipedia?===
===What can I find at WikiIslam that I cannot find at Wikipedia?===
Line 107: Line 103:
==About Us==
==About Us==


===Is WikiIslam Islamophobic, racist or a hate site?===
===Does WikiIslam permit Islamophobic, racist, or hateful content?===


No, WikiIslam is not Islamophobic, racist or a hate site. To make such a claim requires [[W:special pleading|special pleading]]. If WikiIslam editors are labeled Islamophobes, racists and hate mongers, it is through no fault of their own, but the biases of the individuals who make these claims.
No, WikiIslam does not permit Islamophobic, racist or a hateful content.


WikiIslam is not European or "Western", it is an international site with administrators, editors and contributors from all over the world, and the content and policies reflect this. The site does not have a left or right-wing political agenda, thus articles concerning immigration and other related issues are strictly prohibited, along with political topics in general. Consequently, readership is vast and not monopolized by European or "Western" viewers.  
WikiIslam is not European or "Western", it is an international site with administrators, editors and contributors from all over the world, and the content and policies reflect this. The site does not have a left or right-wing political agenda, thus articles concerning immigration and other related issues are strictly prohibited, along with political topics in general. Consequently, readership is vast and not monopolized by European or "Western" viewers.  
Line 115: Line 111:
Many if not most of the site's administrators and editors are from a Muslim background or are skeptics from Muslim majority nations and no infrequently have some level of formal Islamic religious training. The information on WikiIslam reflect what the religious sources say, so any negative or unflattering information concerning Islam or Prophet Muhammad cannot be described as the fault of editors. The information is very simply what the religious texts relate.  
Many if not most of the site's administrators and editors are from a Muslim background or are skeptics from Muslim majority nations and no infrequently have some level of formal Islamic religious training. The information on WikiIslam reflect what the religious sources say, so any negative or unflattering information concerning Islam or Prophet Muhammad cannot be described as the fault of editors. The information is very simply what the religious texts relate.  


There are also many individuals and websites that critique all forms of beliefs, but this does not make them phobic, racist or hatemongers. For instance, Christians are the most widely persecuted religious group on earth, the majority of worldwide Christians are non-white, and Christianity is even sub-Saharan Africa's largest religion. This does not make criticism of Christianity or the actions and claims of its adherents, racist and phobic, as is often made to be the case with Islam (even as it is Christians and not Muslims who comprise the most widely persecuted religious group on earth - it is also worth noting that while left-leaning political parties in Western countries often go out of their way to make Muslim diasporas feel included, the same is hardly if ever the case in Muslim-majority countries with respect to their Christian and other religious minorities).
There are also many individuals and websites that critique all forms of beliefs, but this does not make them phobic, racist or hatemongers. For instance, Christians are the most widely persecuted religious group on earth, the majority of worldwide Christians are non-white, and Christianity is even sub-Saharan Africa's largest religion. This does not make criticism of Christianity or the actions and claims of its adherents, racist and phobic, as is often made to be the case with Islam (even as it is Christians and not Muslims who comprise the most widely persecuted religious group on earth, it is worth noting that while left-leaning political parties in Western countries often go out of their way to make Muslim diasporas feel included, the same is hardly - if ever - the case in Muslim-majority countries with respect to their Christian and other religious minorities).


===Is WikiIslam a propaganda site?===
===Does WikiIslam permit politically-charged content?===


No, it is not. Propaganda is generally understood to be “a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position.” Sites which support women's rights, gay rights, refute Creationism or inform the public on matters concerning the science of Evolution could be argued, along with literally any site that possesses a point of view, to fit this definition.  
No, WikiIslam does not permit content of a political nature. WikiIslam does not endorse any particular political ideology.  


===Is WikiIslam a right-wing or counter-jihad site?===
===Does WikiIslam permit content on the "positive" aspects of Islam?===
 
No, WikiIslam is not a right-wing or counter-jihad site. We do not endorse any particular political ideology. Thus, contributors to WikiIslam are from all positions of the political spectrum.
 
According to Wikipedia, "Counter-jihad discourse mixes valid concerns about jihad-inspired terrorism with far more complex political issues about immigration to Europe from predominantly Muslim countries," and that "Bat Ye'Or's Eurabia [and other such conspiracy theories] are important to the movement. The main theme of these theories is an allegation that European leaders allow a Muslim dominance of Europe, whether by intention or not, through multicultural policies and lax immigration laws." WikiIslam does not cover political issues such as multiculturalism or immigration. Nor does it entertain related conspiracy theories such as Barack Obama being a secret Muslim.
 
While criticism of Islam is a favorite topic among far-right political groups, it is an unfortunate stereotype that all those critical of Islam are immediately assumed to hold far-right political views. Indeed, the religiously unaffiliated, of whom ex-Muslims are mostly a part, are widely known to favor a liberal political outlook.
 
===I've heard many good things about Islam. Why doesn’t this site talk about them?===


WikiIslam is naturally comprised of the contributions made to it by its editors, the great majority of whom are interested in critical perspectives on Islam. As a result, often-important "good" and "neutral" matters concerning Islam sometimes receive a less intensive treatment on the wiki. Constructing this base of more general and even positive knowledge about Islam is, like the rest of the wiki, an ongoing project, and it is important to understand, as per WikiIslam's mission statement, that articles on such "polemically-benign" topics are absolutely and incontrovertibly allowed and encouraged on the wiki.   
WikiIslam is naturally comprised of the contributions made to it by its editors, the great majority of whom are interested in critical perspectives on Islam. As a result, often-important "good" and "neutral" matters concerning Islam sometimes receive a less intensive treatment on the wiki. Constructing this base of more general and even positive knowledge about Islam is, like the rest of the wiki, an ongoing project, and it is important to understand, as per WikiIslam's mission statement, that articles on such "polemically-benign" topics are absolutely and incontrovertibly allowed and encouraged on the wiki.   


===Was WikiIslam created by Christian missionaries?===
Editors interested in spreading information on the aspects of Islam they perceive to be positive are encouraged to contribute to the wiki, along with anyone else aiming to contribute accurate and objective content, no matter whether it is perceived as being positive or negative.
 
No. WikiIslam was founded by an atheist. However, labeling any and all criticism of Islam as "Christian missionary work" unfortunately remains a widespread slur. Any content apologizing for or promoting other religions is strictly prohibited. If one locates such content any where on the wiki, the administrators should be notified, and the content will be removed immediately.
 
===Is WikiIslam owned by "the Jews"?===
 
No. WikiIslam is currently managed by the [https://exmuslims.org/ Ex-Muslims of North America].
 
===Is WikiIslam funded by "the Jews"?===


No. However, Ex-Muslims of North America does accept [https://exmuslims.org/donate/ donations].
===Who owns, operates and finances WikiIslam?===


===Is WikiIslam pro-Israel?===
WikiIslam is currently managed by the [https://exmuslims.org/ Ex-Muslims of North America], which a registered non-profit. The organization accepts [https://exmuslims.org/donate/ donations here].
===Who founded WikiIslam?===


No. This is not a political wiki. WikiIslam focus solely on Islam. Any politically charged articles will be immediately updated, [http://www.wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Videos_on_Islam:Israeli_Palestinian_Conflict&action=edit&redlink=1 deleted] or [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikiislam.net%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DWikiIslam%253ASandbox%252FIsrael_vs_genocide%26action%3Dhistorysubmit%26diff%3D65682%26oldid%3D51243&date=2012-09-06 removed] from the wiki.
WikiIslam was created on October 27, 2005 by various online activists led by [[User:Axius|Axius]] and was hosted on server space provided by Faith Freedom International. Starting in August 2008, the site separated from FFI and operated as an independent site. In 2015, following excessive amounts of vandalism, the site came under the management of the Ex-Muslims of North America.  
===Is WikiIslam owned by Ali Sina or Faith Freedom International?===
 
No, it is not. WikiIslam was created on October 27, 2005 in collaboration with various individuals from Faith Freedom International who provided the site with server space, technical help and exposure. However, in August 2008, the site was moved out of FFI's server and operated as an independent site. In 2015, following excessive amounts of vandalism, the site came under the management of the Ex-Muslims of North America.  


===What is the religious persuasion of the contributors to WikiIslam?===
===What is the religious persuasion of the contributors to WikiIslam?===
Line 180: Line 158:
Help is always appreciated and can come in various forms, including: new ideas, content-writing, data scanning and collection, translations, copy-editing, marketing and donations (see [[WikiIslam:Join_the_Team#Ways_To_Help|Ways To Help]] for more details).
Help is always appreciated and can come in various forms, including: new ideas, content-writing, data scanning and collection, translations, copy-editing, marketing and donations (see [[WikiIslam:Join_the_Team#Ways_To_Help|Ways To Help]] for more details).


===Can anyone create a login id and contribute to this website?===
===Can anyone create a login ID and contribute to this website?===


Anyone without destructive and malicious intent is fully welcome to contact administrators and request an editor account. While there is, at present, a screening process (to help avoid the overwhelming bout of vandalism experience by WikiIslam in the recent past), anyone seeking to make genuine, constructive contributions - even if just grammar and formatting edits - is allowed to possess a fully-functional editors account.
Anyone without destructive and malicious intent is fully welcome to contact administrators and request an editor account (these accounts will be readily provided). Anyone seeking to make genuine, constructive contributions - even if just grammar and formatting edits - is allowed to possess a fully-functional editors account.


===I want to create an article about atheism, Christianity or Hinduism. Can I start one?===
===Can I create an article about another religion?===


No. WikiIslam focuses solely on Islam. Any irrelevant articles will be updated, deleted or removed from the wiki.
No. WikiIslam focuses solely on Islam. WikiIslam do not endorse any religion, worldview, or hierarchy thereof. Any such irrelevant and biased articles will be updated, deleted or removed from the wiki.


===I want to create an article proving Christianity or Hinduism is superior to Islam. Can I start one?===
Topics regarding other religious traditions are only allowed insofar as they are discussed in a comparative context with Islam, and even in such cases it is necessary that the article focus on comparisons with Islam and not focus on other topics with no relation to Islam.


No. WikiIslam do not endorse any religion, worldview, or hierarchy thereof. Any such articles will be updated, deleted or removed from the wiki.
===Can I contribute politically-charged content?===


Topics regarding other religious traditions are only allowed insofar as they are discussed in a comparative context with Islam, and even in such cases it is necessary that the Islamic perspective be the main focus of the article.
No. This is not a political wiki. WikiIslam's aim is to remain neutral towards issues of a political rather than religious nature. Any such articles will be updated, [http://www.wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Left-Islamist_alliance&action=edit&redlink=1 deleted] or removed from the wiki.
 
===Can I write an article antagonizing Muslim immigration, multiculturalism, leftists or Barack Obama?===
 
No. Nor can you create articles promoting any of the above. This is not a political, let alone "[[WikiIslam:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Is_WikiIslam_a_right-wing_or_counter-jihad_site.3F|counter-jihad]]", wiki. WikiIslam's aim is to remain neutral towards issues of a political rather than religious nature. Any such articles will be updated, [http://www.wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Left-Islamist_alliance&action=edit&redlink=1 deleted] or removed from the wiki.


===I want to become an admin and open up my own language's sub-domain. Can I start one?===
===I want to become an admin and open up my own language's sub-domain. Can I start one?===


Roughly a front page's worth of translations (about 25-35 full-length articles, excluding links or media pages) before considering to launch a new sub-domain. More information about translations can be found at [[WikiIslam:Translations]]. WikiIslam's core principles must be maintained on all sub-domains, and may be deactivated if they fail to do so.  
Roughly a front page's worth of translations (about 25-35 full-length articles, excluding links or media pages) are required before considering to launch a new sub-domain. More information about translations can be found at [[WikiIslam:Translations]]. WikiIslam's core principles must be maintained on all sub-domains, and may be deactivated if they fail to do so.  


One of the key rules to follow when translating these pre-sub-domain articles is that they should always remain absolutely faithful to the original English work, retaining a scholarly tone and information. The reason for accurate translations to begin with is that it allows new editors in that particular language to understand the style, tone, and quality that is expected in all languages.
One of the key rules to follow when translating these pre-sub-domain articles is that they should always remain absolutely faithful to the original English work, retaining a scholarly tone and information. The reason for accurate translations to begin with is that it allows new editors in that particular language to understand the style, tone, and quality that is expected in all languages.
Line 210: Line 184:
Those who would like to see a WikiIslam sub-domain in their language are advised to join the [[WikiIslam:Discussions/Translation_Project|WikiIslam Translation Project]] and start translating articles.
Those who would like to see a WikiIslam sub-domain in their language are advised to join the [[WikiIslam:Discussions/Translation_Project|WikiIslam Translation Project]] and start translating articles.


===I want to donate to the site but have no PayPal account. Can you give me your postal address?===
===Can you give me your postal address?===


No, for obvious reasons we cannot. If you would honestly like to help, please open a PayPal account or consider an alternative way to [[WikiIslam:Join the Team|support the site]].
No, for obvious reasons we cannot. If you would honestly like to help, consider an alternative way to [[WikiIslam:Join the Team|support the site]].


===I know a great book/blog/website you could use to improve the wiki. What should I do?===
===I know a great book/blog/website you could use to improve the wiki. What should I do?===
Line 220: Line 194:
==Requests==
==Requests==


===Can someone do XYZ, create/edit an article for me?===
===Can someone do XYZ or create/edit an article for me?===


You can leave a request on the relevant [[WikiIslam:Discussions|Discussions]] page, however WikiIslam can make no guarantees as to whether or not editors will take on the task of writing the articles suggested.
You can leave a request on the relevant [[WikiIslam:Discussions|Discussions]] page, however WikiIslam can make no guarantees as to whether or not editors will take on the task of writing the articles suggested.
Line 228: Line 202:
No, WikiIslam is not a recruiting ground for Wikipedia projects. Editors and readers are allowed to network for such purposes on personal talk pages and through other means however they see fit, but such activity is not otherwise permitted on WikiIslam.
No, WikiIslam is not a recruiting ground for Wikipedia projects. Editors and readers are allowed to network for such purposes on personal talk pages and through other means however they see fit, but such activity is not otherwise permitted on WikiIslam.


===Muslims are claiming XYZ about Islam. Can I have some help refuting this?===
===Someone is falsely claiming XYZ about Islam. Can I have some help refuting this?===


While WikiIslam encourages requesting and recommending novel content on the site's discussions and talk pages, requests for help with everyday online debates are better suited to the various forums found online dedicated to this sort of discussion (e.g. [https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/ Ex-Muslims Reddit], [https://www.councilofexmuslims.com/ Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain Forum], [https://www.religiousforums.com/forums/islam-dir.11/ Religious Forums], and [http://www.interfaith.org/forum/islam.html/ The Interfaith Forum]). Open a thread under the [http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewforum.php?f=22&sid=d49039027d61629d68981293d3281497 Islam: Questioned, Defended, & Explained] or [http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=d49039027d61629d68981293d3281497 The Quran and Hadith] sub forums, and you should receive an answer. Informing us of a claim by posting links to them on our discussions page may be construed as a form of promotion or spam, so please do not do that. Instead you are welcome to [[WikiIslam:Contact Us|email us]] your queries.  
While WikiIslam encourages requesting and recommending novel content on the site's discussions and talk pages, requests for help with everyday online debates are better suited to the various forums found online dedicated to this sort of discussion (e.g. [https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/ Ex-Muslims Reddit], [https://www.councilofexmuslims.com/ Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain Forum], [https://www.religiousforums.com/forums/islam-dir.11/ Religious Forums], and [http://www.interfaith.org/forum/islam.html/ The Interfaith Forum]). Informing wiki editors of a claim by posting links to it on discussions pages may be construed as a form of promotion or spam, so please do not do that.  


==Vandalism and Security==
==Vandalism and Security==


===Muslims openly discuss hacking/vandalizing the site, so is the content safe from their illegal activities?===
===Certain online forums openly discuss hacking/vandalizing this site, so is the content safe from their illegal activities?===


Yes. We are aware of the high risk of vandalism to this website and are prepared to effectively deal with any attempt to sabotage its content. In any case this is a wiki website, which means the website can always recover from any amount of vandalism. We also make regular data backups in multiple locations. We did lose 5 day's worth of edits in April 2007 after the server was hacked, but fortunately there was little editing that was done during those 5 days. This was the only time we have lost data.
Yes. WikiIslam admins are aware of the high risk of vandalism to this website and are prepared to effectively deal with any attempt to sabotage its content. In any case this is a wiki website, which means the website can always recover from any amount of vandalism. WikiIslam admins regularly generate data backups in multiple locations. Once, the wiki lost 5 day's worth of edits in April 2007 after the server was hacked, but fortunately there was little editing that was done during those 5 days. That was only time site data was ever irreparably lost.


===Why not disallow IP edits to minimize vandalism?===
===Why were IP edits disabled? Is WikiIslam trying to restrict who is and is not allowed to edit? Does this mean the wiki will be biased?===
Following a surge of vandalism efforts, it was felt that the net negative impact of continuing to allow IP edits outweighed its positives. Currently, a thorough cleanup of the website and refocusing of the website is underway, with the general objective of making the site focus on broader topics within Islam and not just its criticisms. While WikiIslam aspires to maintain its critical, non-dogmatic treatment of Islam, it is decidedly the case that openly antagonizing Muslims is contrary to and indeed undermines the site's purpose. After such content has been satisfactorily updated and removed, WikiIslam may once again open itself to IP edits, though such a return cannot be guaranteed.


The reasons are threefold:
It is important to note that throughout all this and into the future, anyone and everyone hoping to contribute constructively to the wiki is allowed to contribute. Aspiring editors are simply required to request an account registration from the wiki administration and undergo a brief vetting process (to make sure such accounts are not wastefully handed out to vandals). Muslims, ex-Muslims, and non-Muslims are all welcome to contribute to the website, so long as adversarial and dogmatic commentary is absent from their contributions. WikiIslam aspires to give an objective, nonpartisan portrait of Islam; contributors from any and all backgrounds can help in achieving this.


*Our pages are under "[[WikiIslam:Pending Changes Protection|Pending-changes protection]]", meaning that all attempts at vandalizing the site are pointless because readers will never see any of it.
Everybody, ranging from critics to apologists of Islam, is welcome to request an account on WikiIslam, so long as they do not proceed to suppress or distort perspective they disagree with. No discrimination on the basis of personal identity will be made in distributing accounts. However, editors activities are monitored. Anyone caught fabricating sources, deliberately presenting distortions of the historical or modern mainstream Islamic tradition, or engaging in personal attacks will be dealt with equally and swiftly, no matter their religious or irreligious self-identification.
*IP editors have contributed some great referenced work to the site (for example, [[Health Effects of Islamic Dress]]).
*More often than not, IP vandals inadvertently contribute positively to the site. They do this by alerting editors of pages that may need to be improved or new pages that may need to be created. For example, [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikiislam.net%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DQuestions_to_Ask_a_Muslim%26action%3Dhistorysubmit%26diff%3D50196%26oldid%3D50068&date=2012-09-06 this bit] of vandalism resulted in an unreferenced page now being [[Questions to Ask About Islam|fully referenced]], and [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikiislam.net%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DAisha%2527s_Age_of_Consummation%26action%3Dhistorysubmit%26diff%3D41569%26oldid%3D41361&date=2012-09-06 this bit] of vandalism resulted in an [[Aishas Age of Consummation|entire new page]] refuting a popular Muslim apologetic.


===WikiIslam advocates free speech but you are oppressing my right to free speech by blocking me. Why?===
Modern reinterpretations of classical Islamic doctrine are always welcome on the site, being a part of the intellectual history and development of Islam, but must always be described as such. Attempts to present modern reinterpretations as somehow historically mainstream will (whether to recast the historical tradition in a more positive or negative light) result in content deletion and account deactivation. This applies equally to, for instance, attempts to present modern Salafi perspectives as historically mainstream as it does to attempts to present Islamic modernist or Islamic feminist perspectives as historically mainstream.


WikiIslam does not advocate ''any'' political positions. WikiIslam consists of an online community whose rules you agree to abide by when ''voluntarily'' joining it. If those rules are broken (e.g. through vandalism and other forms of disruption) then you will be sanctioned (given a warning or blocked, depending on the situation). Outside of our policies, the only position we hold is that every individual, no matter their gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, nationality, religious beliefs or political views are equals and should be treated as such. This does not exempt any of the aforementioned groups from being required to adhere to the site's policies and guidelines.  
===Why should I be blocked for including my opinions in an article?===
 
WikiIslam does not advocate ''any'' political or religious positions. WikiIslam consists of an online community whose rules you agree to abide by when ''voluntarily'' joining it. If those rules are broken (e.g. through vandalism and other forms of disruption) then you will be sanctioned (given a warning or blocked, depending on the situation). Outside of our policies maintain that every individual, no matter their gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, nationality, religious beliefs or political views are equals and should be treated as such. This does not exempt any of the aforementioned groups from being required to adhere to the site's policies and guidelines.  


===Why are you censoring me by deleting/wiping my comments or edits?===
===Why are you censoring me by deleting/wiping my comments or edits?===


WikiIslam does not "censor" people because it "has an agenda" or is "afraid of criticism", as has been suggested by some people. Unlike most pro-Islamic websites, we welcome an opposing view and actually host [[:Category:Pro-Islamic Content|pro-Islamic content]] and responses. It may be hard for a few individuals to comprehend our administrative actions but we will do our best to explain: take, for instance, the fact that removing pages about motor vehicles in a book about aircrafts is not censorship. Nor is removing/updating/revising inaccurate or inappropriate information from a text book.  
WikiIslam does not "censor" people because it "has an agenda" or is "afraid of criticism". Indeed, WikiIslam welcomes every legitimate point of view and actually and strives to document the developments and changes that take place in Islamic beliefs over time. Modern or reformed Islamic perspectives are welcome on the wiki, but must be described as such and cannot pretend to being historically mainstream.  


Simply put; removing content that violates this website's policies is not censorship. If errors, incomprehensible English or bad formatting is inserted into our articles, we will revert them. If insults, threats and other forms of vandalism are inserted into our articles, we will wipe them from the pages' history. The same principle applies to talk pages. If people violate the talk page guidelines, post insults, off-topic rants or questions on talk pages, they will be deleted or wiped from the talk page's history (depending on the nature of the comment itself). These are straightforward and commonsense policies, and in no way can they be construed as "censorship" (at least not in the sense of how some are trying to portray it).
Besides this strict policy ''against'' censorship, the wiki also refuses to host irrelevant content. Content having nothing to do with Islam, such as an article about a certain make of car or aircraft, will be removed. This is also utterly unrelated to WikiIslam's ''anti''-censorship policy and by no means violates it.  


People are entirely free to voice their complaints or concerns about WikiIslam (this is why we provide an [[WikiIslam:Contact Us|email address]] for anyone who would like to contact us). However, we are not here to pander to time-wasters who disrupt our editors with inane questions in the name of "dialogue" or hypocritical vandals who almost always ''delete'' valid material while adding their own, by leaving their useless edits on display.
Simply put, removing content that violates this website's policies is not censorship. If errors, incomprehensible English or bad formatting is inserted into articles, those edits are subject to reversion. If insults, threats and other forms of vandalism are inserted into articles, they will be wiped from the pages' history. The same principle applies to talk pages. If people violate the talk page guidelines, post insults, off-topic rants or questions on talk pages, they will be deleted or wiped from the talk page's history (depending on the nature of the comment itself). These are straightforward and commonsense policies, and in no way can they be construed as "censorship".
 
People are entirely free to voice their complaints or concerns about WikiIslam (this is why an [[WikiIslam:Contact Us|email address]] is provided for anyone who would like to reach out). However, WikiIslam will not pander to time-wasters who disrupt editors with inane questions in the name of "dialogue" or vandals who seek to ''delete'' valid material while adding their own.


==Miscellaneous==
==Miscellaneous==


===Does WikiIslam claim that Taqiyya allows Muslims to lie whenever they want?===
===Islam has many sects and interpretations, so what definition of "Islam" does this site use?===
 
No. Taqiyya does not mean "lying" in Islam. It only refers to a specific doctrine, a predominantly Shi'ite one, used by them in order to save their own lives or avoid some other form of severe persecution. Critics of Islam are often ridiculed because they tend to conflate this doctrine with that of lying in general, leading to the mislabelling of all forms of religious lying as an example of "taqiyya" (See, "[[Taqiyya]]" and "[[Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Lying and Deception]]" for more information on this subject).


===Islam has many sects and interpretations, so what definition of "Islam" does this site use?===
When anyone refers to "Islam" without providing a qualifier, it is widely understood to mean [[Sunni]] Islam. For example, the [[Five Pillars of Islam]] is a set of beliefs specific to the Sunnis, but it is never referred to as the "Five Pillars of ''Sunni'' Islam". This is no surprise, considering the Sunnis (which include the Salafis or "Wahhabis") account for up to 90% of all Muslims. Sunni Islam itself is also widely referred to as "mainstream" and "orthodox" Islam (indeed, in at least one sense, the word "''Shi'a''" literally means "sect"). Therefore, when referring to the beliefs of a version of Islam other than the Sunni version, editors must always make sure the readers know this by specifying the name of the sect or cult (e.g. Shi'ite, Qur'anist, etc.). With these qualifications, content regarding any belief system that refers to itself as Islamic is welcome on the wiki, as WikiIslam is not in the business of distinguishing "true" or "false" forms of Islam.


When anyone refers to "Islam" without providing a qualifier, it is widely understood to mean [[Sunni]] Islam. For example, the [[Five Pillars of Islam]] is a set of beliefs specific to the Sunnis, but it is never referred to as the "Five Pillars of ''Sunni'' Islam". This is no surprise, considering the Sunnis (which include the Salafis or "Wahhabis") account for up to 90% of all Muslims. It is the original Islamic sect that all other smaller and mostly irrelevant sects broke away from. And Sunni Islam itself is also known as "mainstream" and "orthodox" Islam. WikiIslam primarily focuses on aspects of Sunni Islam. When referring to the beliefs of a version of Islam other than the mainstream, orthodox version, we always make sure the readers know this by specifying the name of the sect or cult (e.g. Shi'ite, Qur'anist, etc.).
Concerning possible variances of interpretations within Sunni Islam, there are four mainstream [[Madh'hab|schools of thought]], which are accepted by one another. Although there are some differences in beliefs and law, the schools generally agree on the more important and consequential issues (e.g. classically: marriages to young girls, the death sentence for apostates, the positive view of female genital mutilation, and so on). In any case, WikiIslam uses the majority views held by both the followers and fuqaha’ (scholars) of Islam. If a minority or modern view is being quoted, the name of that particular Madh'hab or sect is required to be provided.  


Concerning possible variances of interpretations within Sunni Islam, there are four mainstream [[Madh'hab|schools of thought]], which are accepted by one another. Although there are some small differences in beliefs, these are negligible since the schools generally agree on the more important issues (e.g. pedophilic marriages to young girls, the death sentence for apostates, the positive view of female genital mutilation, and so on). In any case, we use the majority views held by both the followers and fuqaha’ (scholars) of Islam. If a minority view is being quoted, the name of that particular Madh'hab will be provided. Some readers may find it worth noting that many consider the minority (or more pleasant) views to be irrelevant since those who hold them also accept the majority (or more unpleasant) views as perfectly acceptable.
''Some readers may find it worth noting that those who hold minority views (often views more pleasant to modern sensibilities) usually also consider majority views perfectly acceptable -- in these cases, holding the minority view does not preclude or undermine the majority view, even if it is disagreeable (e.g. the execution of apostates), and so the proponents of minority views are often still left tacitly approving majority views that may be considered disagreeable. This phenomenon often renders approval of disagreeable practices implicit in modern or minority interpretive circles, forcing the question of whether a meaningful change of belief has in fact been attained.''  


===I have a complaint/concern/serious matter to discuss. What should I do?===
===I have a complaint/concern/serious matter to discuss. What should I do?===


If you have a complaint, concern or some other serious matter you would like to discuss with us, please feel free to use the email address found [[WikiIslam:Contact Us|here]]. However, be aware that emails which contain death threats or insults will be ignored. Do not post complaints, concerns or other serious matters on the [[WikiIslam:Discussions|Discussions]] pages. That is not why they are there for. Those pages are there for friendly discussions between editors (or for general enquiries), and we will not tolerate users who attempt to disrupt or discourage our editors with their complaints. If you do decide to violate our site's policies by posting them in the wrong place, your complaint will be reverted/wiped from the page's history and you will risk being blocked from further editing.  
If you have a complaint, concern or some other serious matter you would like to discuss with site admins, please feel free to use the email address found [[WikiIslam:Contact Us|here]]. However, be aware that emails which contain death threats or insults will be ignored. Do not post complaints, concerns or other serious matters on the [[WikiIslam:Discussions|Discussions]] pages. That is not why they are there for. Those pages are there for friendly discussions between editors (or for general enquiries), and users who attempt to disrupt or discourage editors with their complaints will not be tolerated whatsoever. If you do decide to violate our site's policies by deliberately posting such messages in an inappropriate place, your complaint will be reverted/wiped from the page's history and you will risk being blocked from further editing.  


==See Also==
==See Also==
Editors, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers
6,632

edits

Navigation menu