6,632
edits
User talk:IbnPinker: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==I mentioned you and other Admins on two Articles, but No response after 1 week== | |||
I am afraid, I am new and made mistake in mentioning you and other Admins, and therefor you people have not got the notifications. First one is the talk page of article "[https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Talk:The_Quran_and_Mountains The Quran and the Mountains]" And second one is my own [https://wikiislam.net/wiki/User_talk:Kamranlashari Talk page], where I started a new topic of "Quran and Expansion of the Universe". | |||
<br /> | |||
[[User:Kamranlashari|Kamranlashari]] ([[User talk:Kamranlashari|talk]]) 18:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Hey, sorry. I was actually out of town travelling and didn't have access to the wiki during that time. Will follow up with you on your talk page. [[User:IbnPinker|IbnPinker]] ([[User talk:IbnPinker|talk]]) 18:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== How to ping other editors? == | == How to ping other editors? == | ||
| Line 42: | Line 50: | ||
:Hey, thanks for following up. As for the tasks, you are correct - the pages you removed are of lesser priority. Thus, I have split the 'pages for creation' section into 'higher' and 'lower' priority and move those four suggested pages to the latter category. Regarding mutah marriage, could you instead qualify the language to indicate what is and what is not controversial? If it is all controversial but the existing text does represent one viewpoint, then you can edit the text to say something like 'while the specifics are debated, some hold that... and others disagree', or something to that effect - even better if you can provide sources on which party espouses a given view point. But so long as the text provided represents one legitimate view point, it can be made useful through qualification. Deletion seems counter productive. Finally, I think the Dhimma page would ultimately require a brief section on the pact of umar (without repeating the entire page) since summarizing other articles under related topics is a standard wiki practice (hence the 'main page' template seen used frequently [https://wikiislam.net/index.php?title=Women_in_Islamic_Law&stable=1 here], for instance). What do you think? [[User:IbnPinker|IbnPinker]] ([[User talk:IbnPinker|talk]]) 20:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC) | :Hey, thanks for following up. As for the tasks, you are correct - the pages you removed are of lesser priority. Thus, I have split the 'pages for creation' section into 'higher' and 'lower' priority and move those four suggested pages to the latter category. Regarding mutah marriage, could you instead qualify the language to indicate what is and what is not controversial? If it is all controversial but the existing text does represent one viewpoint, then you can edit the text to say something like 'while the specifics are debated, some hold that... and others disagree', or something to that effect - even better if you can provide sources on which party espouses a given view point. But so long as the text provided represents one legitimate view point, it can be made useful through qualification. Deletion seems counter productive. Finally, I think the Dhimma page would ultimately require a brief section on the pact of umar (without repeating the entire page) since summarizing other articles under related topics is a standard wiki practice (hence the 'main page' template seen used frequently [https://wikiislam.net/index.php?title=Women_in_Islamic_Law&stable=1 here], for instance). What do you think? [[User:IbnPinker|IbnPinker]] ([[User talk:IbnPinker|talk]]) 20:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
::hi ibnpinker. In light of the revamp wikislam is undergoing, i think it would be wiser if we keep the tasks page concise and including only the utmost imp topics hence why I removed them. As for the mutah marriage, I have revised the info i wrote and found it to be not accurate enough to represent the issue and a bit uncredible, hence why i removed it. I have taken screenshots of the data I wrote to further my research and rewrite this section with more credible info. btw do we have people who speak arabic on our team? i could use some help for an upcoming article idea. Thanks! | |||
:::You make fair points. I removed the four somewhat obscure topics from the tasks page and accepted your edit to the women in islamic law page. if you intend on replacing that misleading info, please do be sure to getting around to replacing it at some point. Asmith and myself both know Arabic and can help if needed. Working with other editors would be better however since Asmith and I are busy with other work including setting up the Arabic wikiislam. Asmith is working on getting you access to our discord chat where you'll be able to talk with the other Arabic speaking editors. Hold tight till he can get you that, sorry for the delays - we are working on setting up additional security procedures atm. [[User:IbnPinker|IbnPinker]] ([[User talk:IbnPinker|talk]]) 18:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC) | |||