'Adalah (Justice): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{QualityScore|Lead=3|Structure=2|Content=2|Language=1|References=3}}'''<nowiki/>'Adalah''' (عدالة) is the Arabic word for "justice" and is used in various forms throughout the [[Portal: Islamic Scriptures|Islamic scriptures]]. While the basic concept of justice in Islam and [[Portal: Islamic Law|Islamic law]] is not wholly distinct from modern conceptions of the word, in the definitional sense of justice being what is fair and reasonable, there are many contexts in which what is considered Islamically just is, in practice, significantly distinct from what a modern sense of justice would entail. An important example of this difference is found in the frequent and broad-ranging preferential legal and financial treatment of Muslims over and above [[non-Muslims]] and of men over and above [[Islam and Women|women]] in [[Sharia|Shariah]] courts -- while such treatment would not evoke in many modern persons the feeling that justice had been attained, it is nonetheless considered just under Islamic law. In addition to these substantive distinctions, which are themselves significant, there are also certain meaning-laden phraseologies and symbols with which the concept of justice is associated in the [[Portal: Islamic Scriptures|Islamic scriptures]] which are noteworthy for historical and literary reasons. One recurrent and still-popular image in the [[Quran]] is that of the Scales of Justice, which are supposed to be employed to determine individuals fate (be it [[Jahannam (Hell)|Hell]] or [[Jannah (Paradise)|Heaven]]) on the Day of Judgement.
{{QualityScore|Lead=3|Structure=4|Content=3|Language=4|References=4}}'''<nowiki/>'Adalah''' (عدالة) is the Arabic word for "justice" and is used in various forms throughout the [[Portal: Islamic Scriptures|Islamic scriptures]]. While the basic concept of justice in Islam and [[Portal: Islamic Law|Islamic law]] is not wholly distinct from modern conceptions of the word, in the definitional sense of justice being what is fair and reasonable, there are many contexts in which what is considered Islamically just is, in practice, significantly distinct from what a modern sense of justice would entail. An important example of this difference is found in the frequent and broad-ranging preferential legal and financial treatment of Muslims over and above [[non-Muslims]] and of men over and above [[Islam and Women|women]] in [[Sharia|Shariah]] courts -- while such treatment would not evoke in many modern persons the feeling that justice had been attained, it is nonetheless considered just under Islamic law. In addition to these substantive distinctions, which are themselves significant, there are also certain meaning-laden phraseologies and symbols with which the concept of justice is associated in the [[Portal: Islamic Scriptures|Islamic scriptures]] which are noteworthy for historical and literary reasons. One recurrent and still-popular image in the [[Quran]] is that of the Scales of Justice, which are supposed to be employed to determine individuals fate (be it [[Jahannam (Hell)|Hell]] or [[Jannah (Paradise)|Heaven]]) on the Day of Judgement.


Distinct from the legal and literary senses of 'Adalah, or justice, in Islam is the theological nature of expectations of Justice from Allah. According to mainstream Islamic theological schools, which defined themselves directly against the Mu'tazilites of the early Islamic period, God must be more powerful than he is just. While the Mu'tazilites, or rationalists, of early Islamic history maintained that God was bound to justice and could neither favor nor disfavor anyone except by their merits and demerits, the theological schools (particularly the Ash'ari school) that emerged to denounce this view as heretical would win first political favor and finally the contest of history. What results is that, today, all major schools of Islamic theology hold that while one may expect justice from Allah on grounds of likelihood, Allah is not bound by it, and may arbitrarily decide to punish or reward whoever he wills. This is because it is believed that justice must be beholden to an all-powerful God rather than vice-versa.
Distinct from the legal and literary senses of 'Adalah, or justice, in Islam is the theological nature of expectations of Justice from Allah. According to mainstream Islamic theological schools, which defined themselves directly against the Mu'tazilites of the early Islamic period, God must be more powerful than he is just. While the Mu'tazilites, or rationalists, of early Islamic history maintained that God was bound to justice and could neither favor nor disfavor anyone except by their merits and demerits, the theological schools (particularly the Ash'ari school) that emerged to denounce this view as heretical would win first political favor and finally the contest of history. What results is that, today, all major schools of Islamic theology hold that while one may expect justice from Allah on grounds of likelihood, Allah is not bound by it, and may arbitrarily decide to punish or reward whoever he wills. This is because it is believed that justice must be beholden to an all-powerful God rather than vice-versa.
Line 42: Line 42:


==Justice and Allah in Islamic theology==
==Justice and Allah in Islamic theology==
The evil deeds of a rich man, when placed upon [[Allah|Allah's]] scales of judgment, will weigh more than had he been a poor man. The hadith describe how the atonement (the good deed required to make up for the evil deed) is different depending on one's income level.
The first significant formal theological school to emerge in the Islamic world was that of the Mu'tazilites, or rationalists. According to the Mu'tazilites, Allah was obligated to do justice to his creation and could not do otherwise. Thus, a good person was guaranteed a good fate in the hereafter, and a bad person a bad fate. Many early Islamic thinkers, however, found this notion to limit God's omnipotence to an unacceptable degree. This theological discontent ultimately manifested itself in the formation of rival theological schools, most famously Ash'arism, the school that became affiliated with Abu Hasan al-Ashari (d. 936). Ash'arism is still the most common theological school in the Muslim world today, and its stance on the doctrine of God being more powerful than he is necessarily just rings true through all major competing theological schools until today.


{{Quote|Abu Hasan al-Ashari (d. 936), quoted in {{citation|author=Fazlur Rahman|title=Islam|edition=first|url=https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo3632939.html|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1970|page=91}}|“Let us imagine a child and a grown-up person in Heaven who both died in the True Faith. The grown-up one, however, has a higher place in Heaven than the child. The child shall ask God: ‘Why did you give that man a higher place?’ ‘He has done many good works’, God shall reply. Then the child shall say, ‘why did you let me die so soon that I was prevented from doing good?’ God will answer, ‘I knew that you would grow up into a sinner; therefore, it was better that you should die a child’. Thereupon a cry shall rise from those condemned to the depths of the Hell, ‘Why, O Lord! did You not let us die before we became sinners?’}}
===In the hadith===
There are some authentic hadiths which convey stories immediately relevant to Allah's relationship with justice. The messages found in these hadith are not always consistent and may not square perfectly or easily with the doctrines endorsed by the main schools of Islamic theology.
====The rich are punished more severely====
{{Quote|1={{Bukhari|3|31|157}}|2=Narrated Abu Huraira:  
{{Quote|1={{Bukhari|3|31|157}}|2=Narrated Abu Huraira:  
While we were sitting with the Prophet a man came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! I have been ruined." Allah's Apostle asked what was the matter with him. He replied "I had sexual intercourse with my wife while I was fasting." Allah's Apostle asked him, "Can you afford to manumit a slave?" He replied in the negative. Allah's Apostle asked him, "Can you fast for two successive months?" He replied in the negative. The Prophet asked him, "Can you afford to feed sixty poor persons?" He replied in the negative. The Prophet kept silent and while we were in that state, a big basket full of dates was brought to the Prophet . He asked, "Where is the questioner?" He replied, "I (am here)." The Prophet said (to him), "Take this (basket of dates) and give it in charity." The man said, "Should I give it to a person poorer than I? By Allah; there is no family between its (i.e. Medina's) two mountains who are poorer than I." The Prophet smiled till his pre-molar teeth became visible and then said, 'Feed your family with it."}}
While we were sitting with the Prophet a man came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! I have been ruined." Allah's Apostle asked what was the matter with him. He replied "I had sexual intercourse with my wife while I was fasting." Allah's Apostle asked him, "Can you afford to manumit a slave?" He replied in the negative. Allah's Apostle asked him, "Can you fast for two successive months?" He replied in the negative. The Prophet asked him, "Can you afford to feed sixty poor persons?" He replied in the negative. The Prophet kept silent and while we were in that state, a big basket full of dates was brought to the Prophet . He asked, "Where is the questioner?" He replied, "I (am here)." The Prophet said (to him), "Take this (basket of dates) and give it in charity." The man said, "Should I give it to a person poorer than I? By Allah; there is no family between its (i.e. Medina's) two mountains who are poorer than I." The Prophet smiled till his pre-molar teeth became visible and then said, 'Feed your family with it."}}


Other narrations describe rich people being judged more harshly on the day of judgement
====The poor are rewarded less handsomely====
{{Quote|{{Muslim|4|1239}}|Abu Huraira reported: The poor amongst the emigrants came to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and said: The possessors of great wealth have obtained the highest ranks and the lasting bliss. He (the Holy Prophet) said: How is that? They said: They pray as we pray, and they observe fast as we observe fast, and they give charity but we do not give charity, and they set slaves free but we do not set slaves free. Upon this the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Shall I not teach you something by which you will catch upon those who have preceded you, and get ahead of those who come after you, only those who do as you do being more excellent than you? They said: Yes, Messenger of Allah. He (the Holy Prophet) said: Extol Allah, declare His Greatness, and Praise Him thirty-three times after every prayer. Abu Salih said: The poor amongst the emigrants returned to the Messenger of Allah (may peace upon him) saying: Our brethren, the possessors, of property have heard what we have done and they did the same. So the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: This is Allah's Grace which He gives to whom He wishes. Sumayy reported: I made a mention of this hadith to some members of my family (and one of them) said: You have forgotten; he (the Holy Prophet) had said (like this): "Extol Allah thirty-three time, praise Allah thirty-three times and declare His Greatness thirty-three times." Ibn `Ajlan said: I made a mention of this hadith to Raja' b. Haiwa and he narrated to me a hadith like this from Abu Salih from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) on the authority of Abu Huraira.}}


==Symbolic associations in scripture==
==Symbolic associations in scripture==


===Scales of Justice in the hereafter===
===Scales of Justice in the hereafter===
Scales can be considered a universal sign for justice. Many ancient religions had such a concept. Maat, the Egyptian goddess of truth, right, and orderly conduct holds the scales which weigh the human heart in the judgment of the dead. Iustitia, the Roman's [[W:Lady_Justice|Lady Justice]], is another goddess of justice who carries measuring balances. And the book of Daniel refers to scales being used to judge a man just as with other ancient religions.<ref>Daniel 5:27</ref>
The symbol of the scales used in trade has been used throughout history by various cultures to represent the concept of Justice and is still seen in court rooms today. For instance Maat, the Egyptian goddess of truth, right, and orderly conduct, holds the scales which weigh the human heart in the judgment of the dead. Justitia, the Roman [[W:Lady_Justice|Lady Justice]], is another goddess of justice who carries measuring balances. And the book of Daniel refers to scales being used to judge a man just as with other ancient religions.<ref>Daniel 5:27</ref>
 
The same symbolism is found in Islamic scriptures, which describe Allah using a balancing scale to measure every individuals good deeds against their bad deeds to determine their fate in the hereafter.


====In the Qur'an====
====In the Quran====


{{Quote|1={{Quran|21|47}}|2=We shall set up scales of justice for the Day of Judgment, so that not a soul will be dealt with unjustly in the least, and if there be (no more than) the weight of a mustard seed, We will bring it (to account): and enough are We to take account.}}
{{Quote|1={{Quran|21|47}}|2=We shall set up scales of justice for the Day of Judgment, so that not a soul will be dealt with unjustly in the least, and if there be (no more than) the weight of a mustard seed, We will bring it (to account): and enough are We to take account.}}
Line 64: Line 73:
====The Law of Honest Scales====
====The Law of Honest Scales====


The Tanakh codified the law that scales and measuring balances be honest. Such a rule and similar statements can be found in the [[Torah]]<ref>Leviticus 19:36</ref> and the book of Proverbs<ref>Proverbs 11:1</ref><ref>Proverbs 16:11</ref>. The Qur'an includes the same:
The Tanakh contains a codified law which requires that scales and measuring balances be honest. Such a rule and similar statements can be found in the [[Torah]]<ref>Leviticus 19:36</ref> and the book of Proverbs<ref>Proverbs 11:1</ref><ref>Proverbs 16:11</ref> and is in all likelihood found throughout various other cultures and religions. The Qur'an includes the this same expectation of worldly scales being used justly.
{{Quote|1={{Quran|26|181-182}}|2=Give just measure, and cause no loss (to others by fraud). And weigh with scales true and upright.}}
{{Quote|1={{Quran|26|181-182}}|2=Give just measure, and cause no loss (to others by fraud). And weigh with scales true and upright.}}


==Islamic Scholar on Justice and Human Rights==
==Islamic scholars on Western vs. Islamic notions of justice==
 
The following fatwa by a famous Saudi fatwa organization reflects the attitude many traditionalist Islamic authorities hold towards Western notions of justice when compared to those found in Islam. While the opinions of Islamic scholars vary widely across the world, the basic message and non-conciliatory attitude this fatwas consists of can be considered representative of the mindset held by the majority of Islamic scholars around the world today. It is worth noting that the small proportion of Islamic scholars residing in the West (only 3% of the global Muslim population lives in the West) is likely to have considerably more conciliatory feelings towards Western notions of justice, but this would represent an exception to the more common global phenomenon of sharp and pronounced disagreement.{{Quote|1=[http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/97827 Western human rights organizations and the ruling on referring to them for judgement]<BR>Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 97827|2=The Muslim should not be deceived by the so called western and European “human rights” organizations, because although they outwardly appear to support the oppressed and to take a stance against torture and undermining of human dignity in prisons and detention centres – which in general terms are good ideas – they also play other roles, and support other principles which are aimed at destroying the family, and opening the door to slander against Islam and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and all his fellow-Prophets. They are opposed to the rule of sharee’ah which enjoins hadd punishments such as stoning for the adulterer, execution for the apostate and cutting off the hand for the thief, becoming part of legislation and being implemented, which is in fact very rare. These organizations are also opposed to the shar’i rulings that have to do with women, such as the necessity of her wali’s consent for marriage, the command to observe hijab, and the prohibition on her mixing, in addition to other principles where they claim that they want to liberate man from religious obligations and to make man free in the way he conducts his affairs, not restricted by good morals or sublime shar’i rulings.<br>
{{Quote|1=[http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/97827 Western human rights organizations and the ruling on referring to them for judgement]<BR>Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 97827|2=The Muslim should not be deceived by the so called western and European “human rights” organizations, because although they outwardly appear to support the oppressed and to take a stance against torture and undermining of human dignity in prisons and detention centres – which in general terms are good ideas – they also play other roles, and support other principles which are aimed at destroying the family, and opening the door to slander against Islam and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and all his fellow-Prophets. They are opposed to the rule of sharee’ah which enjoins hadd punishments such as stoning for the adulterer, execution for the apostate and cutting off the hand for the thief, becoming part of legislation and being implemented, which is in fact very rare. These organizations are also opposed to the shar’i rulings that have to do with women, such as the necessity of her wali’s consent for marriage, the command to observe hijab, and the prohibition on her mixing, in addition to other principles where they claim that they want to liberate man from religious obligations and to make man free in the way he conducts his affairs, not restricted by good morals or sublime shar’i rulings.<br><br>
To sum up what these organizations promote: it is that man should be able to do whatever he wants, no matter how perverse. They support lesbians, homosexuals and bisexuals, and religious deviance. They regard it as a human right to disbelieve in whatever religions one wants and to express one’s opinion – even about the Prophets – without any fear or shame, and they also support the liberation of woman from the control of her father, husband or religion.<br>
To sum up what these organizations promote: it is that man should be able to do whatever he wants, no matter how perverse. They support lesbians, homosexuals and bisexuals, and religious deviance. They regard it as a human right to disbelieve in whatever religions one wants and to express one’s opinion – even about the Prophets – without any fear or shame, and they also support the liberation of woman from the control of her father, husband or religion.<br><br>
 
Secondly:<br>
Secondly:<br>
There follow some of the articles of the [http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ Universal Declaration on Human Rights], which was approved by the United Nations on 10/12/1948 CE, which we are quoting from their website: ''[Quotes from Articles 2, 18, & 19]''<br>
There follow some of the articles of the [http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ Universal Declaration on Human Rights], which was approved by the United Nations on 10/12/1948 CE, which we are quoting from their website: ''[Quotes from Articles 2, 18, & 19]''<br>


Editors, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers
6,632

edits

Navigation menu