em-bypass-2
1,979
edits
User talk:Prekladator: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Uthmani script for word count
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I guess all the word count articles are counting the usual Arabic script and only "prayer" is in Uthmani script. If we start checking Uthmani and do the count for lots of words like heaven, hell, life, death, angels, day, year etc. will those counts be non-miraculous? I guess they will. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 12:25, 22 November 2016 (EST) | I guess all the word count articles are counting the usual Arabic script and only "prayer" is in Uthmani script. If we start checking Uthmani and do the count for lots of words like heaven, hell, life, death, angels, day, year etc. will those counts be non-miraculous? I guess they will. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 12:25, 22 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:: I am using Uthmani all the time. Only in the case of "prayers" the salawat appeared too much in it. [[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 12:49, 22 November 2016 (EST) | :: I am using Uthmani all the time. Only in the case of "prayers" the salawat appeared too much in it. [[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 12:49, 22 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:::If that is the case, do you know when (and why) the change to simple script occurred? This is important because it means the Quran has got a major change and we will have to put this in several articles. | |||
:::I also think about vice versa. The miracles in Uthmani are probably not present in simple Arabic. If any of the apologists are using simple arabic, they are in a trap :P [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 13:11, 22 November 2016 (EST) | |||