Talk:List of Genuine Islamic Inventions Innovations Records and Firsts: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:


:Ok. Thanks. I am really not clear about what this whole website is about - even after reading the FAQ, etc. I thought that it was supposed to be more balanced and neutral. As Axius mentioned above, this website focuses exclusively on the criticism of Islam. I think that most people tend to feel that if some point of view is very extreme, it is more easy to discredit it (even though you have all your sources documented).  I still don't understand why under "Inventions" and "Innovations" you don't have anything positive. This makes it seem extremely one sided. This particular page still causes me to have the impression that the whole website is a joke. That's why I still think you should either have positive innovations, or else call this section "negative innovations and inventions by Islam".  The title makes it seem neutral, but the content only looks at negative things, hence the disconnect (which makes it seem like there's a hidden agenda).  I hope I'm making sense.  [[User:Iridium|Iridium]] ([[User talk:Iridium|talk]]) 18:59, 6 August 2014 (PDT)
:Ok. Thanks. I am really not clear about what this whole website is about - even after reading the FAQ, etc. I thought that it was supposed to be more balanced and neutral. As Axius mentioned above, this website focuses exclusively on the criticism of Islam. I think that most people tend to feel that if some point of view is very extreme, it is more easy to discredit it (even though you have all your sources documented).  I still don't understand why under "Inventions" and "Innovations" you don't have anything positive. This makes it seem extremely one sided. This particular page still causes me to have the impression that the whole website is a joke. That's why I still think you should either have positive innovations, or else call this section "negative innovations and inventions by Islam".  The title makes it seem neutral, but the content only looks at negative things, hence the disconnect (which makes it seem like there's a hidden agenda).  I hope I'm making sense.  [[User:Iridium|Iridium]] ([[User talk:Iridium|talk]]) 18:59, 6 August 2014 (PDT)
::Is there anything such as a fair and balanced view of Hitler?
::This article is also a reaction to false Islamic claims like [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/How_Islamic_Inventors_Did_Not_Change_The_World] (as you can see the article's lead mentions that) and responds with "Here are actual firsts from Islam and Muslims and here is all the evidence behind it".
:: ''"This particular page still causes me to have the impression that the whole website is a joke."'' - many people disagree ([http://wikiislam.net/wiki/What_People_Say_About_WikiIslam read what they say])
::You can also ask why we dont have anything positive from Muslims listed under [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Genuine_Islamic_Inventions_Innovations_Records_and_Firsts#Terrorism Terrorism]. What could be added about that to that section? Not a lot. Thats the point. There are very few actual inventions due to Islam or contributed by Muslims (hence the lack of [http://europenews.dk/en/node/13583 nobel prizes] for example). Sorry that you dont like the  website or dont understand the mission (nothing we can do about that). You can go to MuslimWiki.com or [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_Science_and_the_Problems_at_Wikipedia Wikipedia.org]; maybe you'll like those websites better. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 19:21, 6 August 2014 (PDT)
Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746

edits

Navigation menu