398
edits
User talk:Lightyears: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Hello, are you currently reviewing updates please?
Lightyears (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:For Crone's article you currently only have a short version of the reference. This seems to be unintentional as your first revision on 10 September removed what was the full reference from your initial comments. It would be better to have the more complete version of the Crone reference for your page update. Similarly, for Tesei's article it's great to link the freely accessible academia copy but as well as giving the full reference. An example of a better format is the Tesei reference in the [[Prophecies in the Quran]] article. | :For Crone's article you currently only have a short version of the reference. This seems to be unintentional as your first revision on 10 September removed what was the full reference from your initial comments. It would be better to have the more complete version of the Crone reference for your page update. Similarly, for Tesei's article it's great to link the freely accessible academia copy but as well as giving the full reference. An example of a better format is the Tesei reference in the [[Prophecies in the Quran]] article. | ||
Lightyears | |||
I've updated the main article. I'm not sure whether it's public yet. When it is I'll delete the sandbox material to avoid confusion. | |||
:Also, feel free to add the points you mentioned on the historical attestation of Muhammad talk page, though it should also be mentioned clearly that Ohlig is considered part of the Revisionist school of thought in Islamic studies, specifically the Inârah Institute who are considered a fringe group by other academic scholars. It looks like there is an intention to flesh out the empty sections at some point but it's fine to make those changes now. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 14:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC) | :Also, feel free to add the points you mentioned on the historical attestation of Muhammad talk page, though it should also be mentioned clearly that Ohlig is considered part of the Revisionist school of thought in Islamic studies, specifically the Inârah Institute who are considered a fringe group by other academic scholars. It looks like there is an intention to flesh out the empty sections at some point but it's fine to make those changes now. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 14:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
[[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 22:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 22:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
Lightyears | |||
I've made some more changes. Would it be possible to finalise the whole thing now? I've asked some questions, and other readers may have the answers. | |||
:Sure, you can go ahead and add your work into the Mecca article itself. At some point we will add some further content/edits. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 00:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Hello, are you currently reviewing updates please? == | |||
Hey Lightyears - I hope you are well and have had a great holiday period! You've previously reviewed and accepted/edited many of my updates (and on the shooting stars page) - I was just checking if they were still coming through okay, as some have been here for about a month? Or if you're taking a break just let me know and I'll reach out to another editior. Cheers, CPO675 | |||
:Hi, due to external events recently I have had to concentrate on other things and have been unable to look at the wiki. Possibly that may change quite soon but otherwise ASmith should be able to help. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 23:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Okay no worries thank you! Will do (Y) | |||