1,399
edits
User talk:1234567/Archive: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Al-Uzza & Friends
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 382: | Line 382: | ||
:I think Al-Uzza would look good in an article about the Satanic Verses. In fact, there is around the internet some lovely neo-Pagan artwork featuring Semitic deities, but most of it would attract copyright restrictions. The image I posted here is public domain.[[User:1234567|1234567]] ([[User talk:1234567|talk]]) 23:29, 20 April 2013 (PDT) | :I think Al-Uzza would look good in an article about the Satanic Verses. In fact, there is around the internet some lovely neo-Pagan artwork featuring Semitic deities, but most of it would attract copyright restrictions. The image I posted here is public domain.[[User:1234567|1234567]] ([[User talk:1234567|talk]]) 23:29, 20 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
::I've added it here: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Satanic_Verses_(The_Life_of_Mahomet) . Yeah, it looks good in that one. However, (Axius can correct me if I'm wrong) neo-Pagan artwork would fall outside of the new policies, even if they were not copyright restricted. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 03:30, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | ::I've added it here: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Satanic_Verses_(The_Life_of_Mahomet) . Yeah, it looks good in that one. However, (Axius can correct me if I'm wrong) neo-Pagan artwork would fall outside of the new policies, even if they were not copyright restricted. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 03:30, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
==Al-Uzza & Friends== | |||
Any examples of that artwork on a temporary upload or external link? Thanks for adding that image. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 09:10, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
:Okay, that wasn't a no, meaning you would consider it. But wouldn't neo-Pagan (i.e. contemporary pagan) artwork be the same as you considering graffiti artwork if it was of a pagan goddess? Unlike the other image provided by 1234567, it wouldn't have any historical connection to the subject. It would just be for "illustrative" purposes (something the new policies say no to).[[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 09:18, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
::I was just wondering what it looks like. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 09:25, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
:::A google search brought up this - everything both ancient and modern. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Al-Uzza+Al-Lat+Manat&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=K2N0UcPHLdCYiAeh8oDwAQ&ved=0CDoQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=621 | |||
:::Yes, I see what you mean about neo-Pagan artwork being a modern reconstruction that would probably have only tenuous links to the original paganism. (''Pace'' those modern pantheists who think otherwise; but neo-Pagans do not sacrifice their infants to Molech!) The spirit of the reconstruction is not too difficult to hit off in the case of the Arabian trinity, since Al-Uzza is Minerva/Athena and Al-Lat is Ceres/Demeter. Manat has no obvious European parallel (the Graiai? Nemesis?), which explains something about the differences between the two cultures; but she is nevertheless a recognisable "type".[[User:1234567|1234567]] ([[User talk:1234567|talk]]) 15:12, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
::::Thanks for the link and info. That is definitely way above my level of expertise/knowledge in that area, but it sounds really interesting. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 10:54, 27 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
:::::Yes, very interesting, but somewhat academic. If Ancient Semitic paganism were still being practised today, we would have to start a WikiSemitism site and write about all the evils of human sacrifice, ritual prostitution and violent raiding. But this isn't the case. The few Neo-Pagans I've met have been very gentle people who try to disbelieve the dark history of the ancient religions and focus on back-to-nature pantheism, healthy eating and meditation. There is no real connection between their beliefs (as shown in the pretty artwork) and the original religions that indirectly inspired them. | |||
:::::By contrast, the problem with Islam is that there are Muslims alive today who try to be exactly like Muhammad.[[User:1234567|1234567]] ([[User talk:1234567|talk]]) 02:07, 29 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
==New articles based on your talk page comments== | |||
hi 1234567, you had left these two talk page comments: (1) [[Talk:Polygamy_in_Islam#Muhammad_married_poor_widows_to_save_them_from_destitution]] and (2) [[Talk:Polygamy_in_Islam#Muhammad_committed_polygamy_out_of_political_necessity]]. These two items could be polished and sourced and moved into a new article for example ''[[Charity and Political Necessity of Muhammad's Marriages]]'' and there can be a combined conclusion like we have [[Qur%27an_Predicted_Black_Holes_And_Pulsars#Conclusion|here]]. This new article can then be linked from [[Polygamy_in_Islam#Muhammad_and_Polygamy|Polygamy in Islam]] in the section Muhammad and Polygamy. | |||
Your first edit was a comment here: [[Talk:Unjust Treatment of Wives (Qur'an 4:129)]] and maybe that can be used in some way as well in that article [[Unjust Treatment of Wives (Qur'an 4:129)]]. | |||
Your knowledge of Muhammad and women in his life and your strong interest in this topic is great and I'm glad you decided to come here share and create what you have. | |||
A few other things, if you like: | |||
* You can create Sandbox links in your user space and use them for as scratchpads for any purpose, e.g. [[User:1234567|Sandbox 1]], [[User:1234567|Sandbox 2]], [[User:1234567|Sandbox 3]] etc, as many as you like. These can be linked on your user page like [[User:Sahabah#Sandboxes|User:Sahabah]] has it | |||
* Old comments on your talk page can be moved into archives: [[User talk:1234567/Archive]] | |||
* Its easy to rename a user (if you'd like to use Petra or anything else, for example), or keep it as it is. | |||
--[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 10:49, 27 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
::Thanks for the reminder. I am in fact feeling the need of sandboxes. | |||
::I was planning to write an article about how none of Muhammad's wives was a destitute widow, a kind of companion piece to the one about how none of them was elderly. While I would also like to write one about how none of the marriages was politically necessary, that one will be more difficult to hit off correctly. It would involve speculation about what ''would have happened'' if he had not acted, e.g., if Khadija had lived another 15 years and therefore he had never married any of the others. And of course we never know what ''would'' have happened. However, it's pretty obvious to me that if Muhammad had never married any of these other women, the big difference to the progress of Islam would have been close to zero. | |||
::I'm currently working on the biographical essay about Aisha. As a biography, it really ought to include some paragraphs about her long widowhood, but I don't have good resources for that at present. I shall probably submit it with only a brief overview of her later life, but add more about this in future, when I have bought a few more books. The stunning thing about Aisha is how she didn't seem to believe in Islam at all, yet she was nevertheless its foremost proponent. | |||
::After that, we have a choice. I could just work through all the wives in chronological order (Sawda, then Hafsa, then Zaynab ... etc.). Or I could follow your original brief, which was a request for controversy, and deal with the major scandals first. The existing article about Safiya needs to be tidied, and there are some great little tidbits that are not commonly known (were you aware that the murdered poet Kaab ibn Al-Ashraf was her cousin, almost certainly a person to whom she was close?). And I notice that so far you don't have any single article about Zaynab bint Jahsh. Again, the story as it's usually told is different from what the sources say: Zayd actually had three other wives beside Zaynab, and he was (at least) her second husband. | |||
::As for the unjust treatment of wives, I think the story about food distribution belongs in the article about Zaynab. For each wife, I shall be writing about how she got along with her co-wives. So any story that involves interactions between two or more of the wives will be included on the page of the wife whom Muhammad married latest. E.g., I have written about how Aisha (second wife) was jealous of the other women but not included specifics about those women. Aisha's general relationship with Sawda (third wife - at least according to Aisha) will be in the article about Sawda, but the incident in which Aisha and Hafsa (fourth wife) colluded to tease Sawda will be under Hafsa. Mariya (thirteenth wife) will not be mentioned until she gets her own article, even though it was an episode in which all the previous wives were involved.[[User:1234567|1234567]] ([[User talk:1234567|talk]]) 16:00, 28 April 2013 (PDT) | |||