Template:Pictorial-Islam-options: Difference between revisions

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 105: Line 105:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Georgics|2=[[File:Georgics.jpg|130px|link=Georgics]]|3=To demonstrate how ludicrously easy it is to prove that any ancient poetry can be reinterpreted to reveal scientific miracles, we present to you a satiric article that 'proves' that the Georgica, written by Virgil in Golden Latin in the year 28 BC, contains scientific miracles. In the very first eight words alone of the Georgics we find no less than five (there's probably many more) scientifically accurate statements of which Virgil himself (born in the first century BC) could not have had any knowledge of, due to science only confirming them many centuries later.  
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Georgics|2=[[File:Georgics.jpg|130px|link=NATVRAE_MIRABILIS_ORIGINISQVE_DIVINAE_GEORGICAE_VERGILII]]|3=To demonstrate how ludicrously easy it is to prove that any ancient poetry can be reinterpreted to reveal scientific miracles, we present to you a satiric article that 'proves' that the Georgica, written by Virgil in Golden Latin in the year 28 BC, contains scientific miracles. In the very first eight words alone of the Georgics we find no less than five (there's probably many more) scientifically accurate statements of which Virgil himself (born in the first century BC) could not have had any knowledge of, due to science only confirming them many centuries later.  


What divine source could have whispered all this into Virgil's ear? Virgil was a polytheist, who worshipped many different gods. Is this truly a miracle sent down from the ancient Roman gods? Let the honest reader draw his or her own conclusions. All we request is that you look upon this with an open mind. ([[Georgics|''read more'']])}}</option>
What divine source could have whispered all this into Virgil's ear? Virgil was a polytheist, who worshipped many different gods. Is this truly a miracle sent down from the ancient Roman gods? Let the honest reader draw his or her own conclusions. All we request is that you look upon this with an open mind. ([[NATVRAE_MIRABILIS_ORIGINISQVE_DIVINAE_GEORGICAE_VERGILII|''read more'']])}}</option>




Line 123: Line 123:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aisha's Age|2=[[File:Moiz amjad.JPG|250px|link=Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aishas Age]]|3=The majority of Muslims today agree that Aisha was nine lunar years old when her marriage to the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, was consummated. However, some modernist Islamic apologists try to cast doubt on the age of Aisha when she married and had sex with Muhammad despite the many sahih hadiths in which Aisha explicitly and directly states that she was nine years old at the time. They are clearly embarrassed that their prophet married and had sex with a nine-year-old pre-pubescent child, and they sometimes seek to explain that Aisha was in fact not nine-years-old as the Sahih hadiths of Aisha’s own testimony claim, but some other ages derived from misquotations, indirect sources, fuzzy dating techniques, and downright slander. The most common of these arguments is propounded by the “Learner”, or Moiz Amjad. ([[Refutation to Muslim Apologetics against Aisha's Age of Consummation|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aisha's Age|2=[[File:Moiz amjad.JPG|250px|link=Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aishas Age]]|3=The majority of Muslims today agree that Aisha was nine lunar years old when her marriage to the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, was consummated. However, some modernist Islamic apologists try to cast doubt on the age of Aisha when she married and had sex with Muhammad despite the many sahih hadiths in which Aisha explicitly and directly states that she was nine years old at the time. They are clearly embarrassed that their prophet married and had sex with a nine-year-old pre-pubescent child, and they sometimes seek to explain that Aisha was in fact not nine-years-old as the Sahih hadiths of Aisha’s own testimony claim, but some other ages derived from misquotations, indirect sources, fuzzy dating techniques, and downright slander. The most common of these arguments is propounded by the “Learner”, or Moiz Amjad. ([[Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aishas Age|''read more'']])}}</option>




Line 173: Line 173:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muhammad and Aisha|2=[[File:Woman-Girl-Man-2.jpg|250px|link=Aisha's Age of Consummation]]|3=Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old and consummated the marriage while she remained pre-pubescent, aged just nine years old. Consequently, while following their prophet's example, Muslims throughout the world and throughout history have married girls as young six and in modern times many Islamic states have set the minimum age of marriage for females to be six or nine years of age.
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muhammad and Aisha|2=[[File:Woman-Girl-Man-2.jpg|250px|link=Aisha Age of Consummation]]|3=Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old and consummated the marriage while she remained pre-pubescent, aged just nine years old. Consequently, while following their prophet's example, Muslims throughout the world and throughout history have married girls as young six and in modern times many Islamic states have set the minimum age of marriage for females to be six or nine years of age.
<BR><BR>
<BR><BR>
{{Bukhari|7|62|65}}<BR>
{{Bukhari|7|62|65}}<BR>
''Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.'' ([[Aisha's Age of Consummation|''read more'']])}}</option>
''Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.'' ([[Aisha Age of Consummation|''read more'']])}}</option>




Line 188: Line 188:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=What They Say About Islam|2=[[File:Noteworthy on Islam.JPG|190px|link=Quotations on Islam from the Noteworthy]]|3="How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=What They Say About Islam|2=[[File:Noteworthy on Islam.JPG|190px|link=Quotations on Islam from Notable Non-Muslims]]|3="How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.


The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men." - '''Sir Winston Churchill''' ([[Quotations on Islam from the Noteworthy|''read more'']])}}</option>
The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men." - '''Sir Winston Churchill''' ([[Quotations on Islam from Notable Non-Muslims|''read more'']])}}</option>





Revision as of 04:11, 23 February 2013

Also see: Template:Pictorial-Islam

Setting the Record Straight: The Non-Miracle of Islamic Science

The Miracle of Islamic Science.jpg

This is a refutation of Dr K. Ajram's Setting the Record Straight: The Miracle of Islamic Science. The purpose of this analysis is to put the achievements of Golden Age Muslim scientists in the proper perspective; neither denigrating their achievements nor inflating them. All scientific and technological progress is accomplished in progression; Muslim achievements are but links in the chain. Few of the great Muslim scientific achievements stood alone, but were derived by Muslim scientists standing on the shoulders of those who came before them. This analysis also highlights the fatal flaw of the Islamic Golden Age. There were few ‘follow-up’ breakthroughs on the backs of the works of the great Muslim scientists. In effect, the Ummah allowed or encouraged these works to wither on the vine or die stillborn, even before the rise of mysticism at the expense of rational thinking, an event often attributed to al-Ghazzali around the turn of the 12th century. Indeed, it would seem orthodox Islam utterly stifles intellectual reasoning. Therefore, Islam is not the cause of scientific progress during the Golden Age. Many people would say that the Golden Age scientific progress was made in spite of Islam, not because of it. A prime example is the great philosopher-physician Ibn Sina (Avicenna) whose work is constantly referenced by Dr K. Ajram. (read more)