The History of al-Tabari: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
m (Bot: Using Hub4 template.)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Book  
<!--
 
NOTE:
 
This page is linked to multiple times by templates. Its sections and their titles should NOT be altered or re-arranged without consulting an administrator first
 
-->{{Infobox Book  
| name          = The History of al-Tabari<BR>Volumes 1-40
| name          = The History of al-Tabari<BR>Volumes 1-40
| title_orig    = Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk
| title_orig    = Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk
Line 26: Line 32:


It forms one of Islam's [[Islam and Scripture|major religious sources]], containing the most complete recension of Ibn Ishaq's [[Sirat Rasul Allah]]<ref>According to Islamic scholar Fred Donner at the University of Chicago, the material in ibn Hisham's and al-Tabari's recensions are "virtually the same" (Ref: ''Donner, Fred McGraw (1998). Narratives of Islamic origins: the beginnings of Islamic historical writing. Darwin Press. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-87850-127-4''). However, some material found in al-Tabari are not preserved by ibn Hisham. For example, al-Tabari includes the episode of the [[Satanic Verses]], while ibn Hisham does not (Ref: ''Raven, Wim, Sīra and the Qurʾān – Ibn Isḥāq and his editors, Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an. Ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Vol. 5. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006. p29-51.'')(Ref: ''Cf., Ibn Ishaq [Guillaume's reconstruction, at 165-167] and al-Tabari [SUNY edition, at VI: 107-112]'').</ref> (the most important biography of Prophet [[Muhammad]], partially forming his [[Sunnah]]), and is universally praised by Muslims for its detail and accuracy concerning Muslim and Middle Eastern history.  
It forms one of Islam's [[Islam and Scripture|major religious sources]], containing the most complete recension of Ibn Ishaq's [[Sirat Rasul Allah]]<ref>According to Islamic scholar Fred Donner at the University of Chicago, the material in ibn Hisham's and al-Tabari's recensions are "virtually the same" (Ref: ''Donner, Fred McGraw (1998). Narratives of Islamic origins: the beginnings of Islamic historical writing. Darwin Press. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-87850-127-4''). However, some material found in al-Tabari are not preserved by ibn Hisham. For example, al-Tabari includes the episode of the [[Satanic Verses]], while ibn Hisham does not (Ref: ''Raven, Wim, Sīra and the Qurʾān – Ibn Isḥāq and his editors, Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an. Ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Vol. 5. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006. p29-51.'')(Ref: ''Cf., Ibn Ishaq [Guillaume's reconstruction, at 165-167] and al-Tabari [SUNY edition, at VI: 107-112]'').</ref> (the most important biography of Prophet [[Muhammad]], partially forming his [[Sunnah]]), and is universally praised by Muslims for its detail and accuracy concerning Muslim and Middle Eastern history.  
Along with the Muslim Students Association's [[Compendium of Muslim Texts]], which include universally accepted translations of the [[Qur'an]] and major [[hadith]] collections, Tabari's History is used as a primary source at [[WikiIslam]].


==Praise and Description==
==Praise and Description==
Line 416: Line 420:
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist|30em}}


[[Category:WikiIslam]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:Literature]]
48,466

edits

Navigation menu