User talk:Axius: Difference between revisions

User talk:Axius (view source)

Revision as of 05:43, 2 March 2015

1,010 bytes added , 2 March 2015

→‎Muhammad and Aisha Task

Sahab

Bureaucrats, Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Suppressors, Administrators

48,466

edits

Revision as of 05:29, 2 March 2015 (view source) Sahab (talk \| contribs) (→‎Muhammad and Aisha Task: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:43, 2 March 2015 (view source) Sahab (talk \| contribs) (→‎Muhammad and Aisha Task) Newer edit →
Line 578:		Line 578:

	And like I mentioned earlier, merging this article also begs the question; why not merge every page concerning Mo and Aisha into that one page? [[Responses_to_Apologetics_-_Muhammad_and_Aisha#The_hadiths_do_not_say_Muhammad_had_sex_with_Aisha_when_she_was_9._They_have_been_poorly_translated\|Argument number 4]] is '''"The hadiths do not say Muhammad had sex with Aisha when she was 9. They have been poorly translated"''', so why not delete the "[[The Meaning of Consummate]]" page and copy/paste that into "Responses to Apologetics: Muhammad and Aisha" too? [[User:Sahab\|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab\|talk]]) 21:29, 1 March 2015 (PST)		And like I mentioned earlier, merging this article also begs the question; why not merge every page concerning Mo and Aisha into that one page? [[Responses_to_Apologetics_-_Muhammad_and_Aisha#The_hadiths_do_not_say_Muhammad_had_sex_with_Aisha_when_she_was_9._They_have_been_poorly_translated\|Argument number 4]] is '''"The hadiths do not say Muhammad had sex with Aisha when she was 9. They have been poorly translated"''', so why not delete the "[[The Meaning of Consummate]]" page and copy/paste that into "Responses to Apologetics: Muhammad and Aisha" too? [[User:Sahab\|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab\|talk]]) 21:29, 1 March 2015 (PST)
			:The only reason I can think of is that both titles have similar words in them ("Refutation/Response" and "Apologetics"). If that's the case, then only a name change is needed to more accurately reflect the topics of the pages. TBH not only does "Refutation of Modern Apologetics Against Aisha's Age" need its name changed, but so does the "Aisha's Age of Consummation" page. I remember you previously said you preferred to keep the title as it is simply because that's an early article. However, the "Aisha's Age of Consummation" page has a misleading title as its content is not really about Aisha's age of consummation. It's about whether or not Mo can be classed as a pedophile. "Refutation of Modern Apologetics Against Aisha's Age" should be renamed "Aisha's Age of Consummation" because that IS the actual topic of the page. And "Aisha's Age of Consummation" should be renamed "Muhammad and Pedophilia" or something like that. [[User:Sahab\|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab\|talk]]) 21:42, 1 March 2015 (PST)