2,743
edits
Iltifat: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
mNo edit summary |
Lightyears (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The Islamic interpretation is that the so called "iltifat" is intentional and that it makes the Quran better. Critics, however, suggest that iltifat is the result and evidence of an imprecisely produced or preserved Qur'an. | The Islamic interpretation is that the so called "iltifat" is intentional and that it makes the Quran better. Critics, however, suggest that iltifat is the result and evidence of an imprecisely produced or preserved Qur'an. | ||
Professor Suleiman Mourad comments on this phenomenon, "There are a few grammatical mistakes in the Qur'an - sometimes a sentence starts in the singular and ends in the plural (e.g., 9:49-50), or two particles are connected when they should not be (e.g., 3:178), or some vowels go wrong in the declensions (e.g., 22:78). This from the viewpoint of a strict linguist. From the traditional vantage point, since the Qur'an is miraculous, these are not errors."<ref>Mourad, Suleiman (2016) ''The Mosaic of Islam: A Conversation with Perry Anderson'', London: Verso, p.7</ref> | |||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||