Autochecked users, em-bypass-1, em-bypass-2
645
edits
Female Genital Mutilation in Islam: Difference between revisions
→Islamic Doctrine Creating Social Conditions Favourable to FGM
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
==Islamic Doctrine Creating Social Conditions Favourable to FGM== | ==Islamic Doctrine Creating Social Conditions Favourable to FGM== | ||
Debates concerning FGM and Islam are generally conducted in terms of what Islamic doctrine decrees concerning FGM. But moral entities (which can be institutions, groups, individuals and ideologies) are also responsible for, and defined by, that which they allow and that which they inadvertently bring about - a mother does not need to ''compel'' her toddler to play with a loaded gun for her to be responsible for any harm that results from it doing so. She merely has to ''allow'' it to play with the loaded gun, or fail to take reasonable measures to prevent it from doing so. Few 19<sup>th</sup> century industrialists ''intended'' their factories to be polluting. But pollution was an inherent consequence of 19<sup>th</sup> century industrialism and 19th Century industrialism was responsible for that pollution. A religion's responsibilities (and identity) do not stop with doctrine, but also include the c''onsequences'' of doctrine, including undesirable and unintended consequences. | Debates concerning FGM and Islam are generally conducted in terms of what Islamic doctrine explicitly decrees concerning FGM. But moral entities (which can be institutions, groups, individuals and ideologies) are also responsible for, and defined by, that which they allow and that which they inadvertently bring about - a mother does not need to ''compel'' her toddler to play with a loaded gun for her to be responsible for any harm that results from it doing so. She merely has to ''allow'' it to play with the loaded gun, or fail to take reasonable measures to prevent it from doing so. Few 19<sup>th</sup> century industrialists ''intended'' their factories to be polluting. But pollution was an inherent consequence of 19<sup>th</sup> century industrialism and 19th Century industrialism was responsible for that pollution. A religion's responsibilities (and identity) do not stop with doctrine, but also include the c''onsequences'' of doctrine, including undesirable and unintended consequences. | ||
A society's kinship system shapes the rest of the culture around itself and has far reaching implications - determining laws, beliefs and institutions that, at first sight, can appear unrelated to kinship and reproduction. Islam, in allowing and encouraging polygyny, not only reproduces the originating conditions for FGM. Islam also enshrines in custom and law the secondary consequences of polygyny, such as bride-price, veiling, gender segregation, arranged marriage, child marriage, and excessive preoccupation with feminine 'purity'. Indeed, Islam could be characterised as: '''''the codification and sacralisation of both polygyny and of the consequences of polygyny'''''. | A society's kinship system shapes the rest of the culture around itself and has far reaching implications - determining laws, beliefs and institutions that, at first sight, can appear unrelated to kinship and reproduction. Islam, in allowing and encouraging polygyny, not only reproduces the originating conditions for FGM. Islam also enshrines in custom and law the secondary consequences of polygyny, such as bride-price, veiling, gender segregation, arranged marriage, child marriage, and excessive preoccupation with feminine 'purity'. Indeed, Islam could be characterised as: '''''the codification and sacralisation of both polygyny and of the consequences of polygyny'''''. | ||