Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions
→Contradictions in the Qur'an and Hadith
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
::::::'''"if Quranists want to use content on our site for any purpose"''' | ::::::'''"if Quranists want to use content on our site for any purpose"''' | ||
::::::Strawman. I never objected to them using this site. My point is that it ONLY benefits their propaganda, nothing else. If we allow something like this, why not also allow Atheistig to write an article about how unreliable the hadith are? Let's go all the way and invalidate 95% of our material just to keep 1 editor happy. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 04:34, 11 April 2014 (PDT) | ::::::Strawman. I never objected to them using this site. My point is that it ONLY benefits their propaganda, nothing else. If we allow something like this, why not also allow Atheistig to write an article about how unreliable the hadith are? Let's go all the way and invalidate 95% of our material just to keep 1 editor happy. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 04:34, 11 April 2014 (PDT) | ||
:::::::''"Let's go all the way and invalidate 95% of our material just to keep 1 editor happy."'' ---- :-) this is an imaginary situation that hasn't happened yet so lets not do that. | |||
:::::::He knows its a Sandbox page that later may or may not be approved so whats the issue? I dont see any. | |||
:::::::''"Mat'n applies to ALL contradictions between the Qur'an and hadith."'' - is Bukhari's criteria the golden absolute rule on deciding whats a contradiction? I would say no. To me a Sahih hadith is Sahih. To most people they are all valid Islamic sources (especially Sahih hadiths). | |||
:::::::''"My point is that it ONLY benefits their propaganda"'' - Again they are a minority. The other side effect is letting the rest of the Muslims know that these contradictions exist. Most Muslims view hadiths as holy. I would say that they would have to deal with the contradiction when they see it and it creates a challenge for them. | |||
::::::: My main point here again is that cases can be argued against equally. Its a Sandbox page and people have the right to work on a Sandbox which later may or may not be approved (as long its not an obvious content violation). | |||
:::::::Saggy, I wanted to add this yesterday: Please dont initiate discussions on Sahab's talk unless it is a matter that pertains only to him. The [[forum]] page should be used for that purpose. It is also a link that is easily accessible on the left. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 04:54, 11 April 2014 (PDT) | |||