em-bypass-2
1,979
edits
User talk:Sahab: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Qur'an 86:7 article (and rationale for certain Article Style and Content guidelines)
| Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
::::I edited some of it, but can we expect a generic argument? Is this backbone-ribs a hot topic recently? Anyway, the claims looks slimmer now. Soures are not even needed. Its all obvious in an image search whether it is vesicles or anything else. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Saggy |Saggy ]] ([[User talk:Saggy |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Saggy |contribs]]) {{#if:04:36, 21 March 2014|  04:36, 21 March 2014|}} ([[WikiIslam:Signatures#Signing_Posts|Remember to sign your comments]]) </small> | ::::I edited some of it, but can we expect a generic argument? Is this backbone-ribs a hot topic recently? Anyway, the claims looks slimmer now. Soures are not even needed. Its all obvious in an image search whether it is vesicles or anything else. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Saggy |Saggy ]] ([[User talk:Saggy |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Saggy |contribs]]) {{#if:04:36, 21 March 2014|  04:36, 21 March 2014|}} ([[WikiIslam:Signatures#Signing_Posts|Remember to sign your comments]]) </small> | ||
:::::Well, when we say "generic", we don't really mean the argument, but the wording of the argument, so that it could be made by a generic (i.e. any) apologist. You've edited those claims but in essence they're still the same arguments, so that's fine. About sources; do you know the origin of that diagram you linked to? Was it from a medical journal or site? If we knew that, we could just link to that in a ref tag. It would also be good to have a source for the % of semen. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 06:52, 21 March 2014 (PDT) | :::::Well, when we say "generic", we don't really mean the argument, but the wording of the argument, so that it could be made by a generic (i.e. any) apologist. You've edited those claims but in essence they're still the same arguments, so that's fine. About sources; do you know the origin of that diagram you linked to? Was it from a medical journal or site? If we knew that, we could just link to that in a ref tag. It would also be good to have a source for the % of semen. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 06:52, 21 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
::::::i got nother[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/modules/reproductiveHealth/anatomy.html]. 4th pic from top. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 09:31, 21 March 2014 (PDT) | |||
== Womb sentence == | == Womb sentence == | ||