User talk:Capitals00: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
:::For Nafisa, I think the new link is better than the ones you gave before (as in, it talks about her beliefs) however it says she believes in Vedanta [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta] which is a Hindu book so she can be a Hindu convert or "humanism" or something like that. Do Sikhs believe in the Vedanta? This is a Hindu book. Please clarify. Hindus can also marry sikhs. According to one link she was listed as a Hinduism convert [http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/72-13262-page6.aspx#startofcomments]. The link is unreliable but the point is to show that she's possibly a hindu rather than a sikh. Most likely she's just a spiritual/humanist kind of person (she says they have a "all gods" alter at home). Just describe it like that in the section. This issue is not worth spending too much time on.
:::For Nafisa, I think the new link is better than the ones you gave before (as in, it talks about her beliefs) however it says she believes in Vedanta [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta] which is a Hindu book so she can be a Hindu convert or "humanism" or something like that. Do Sikhs believe in the Vedanta? This is a Hindu book. Please clarify. Hindus can also marry sikhs. According to one link she was listed as a Hinduism convert [http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/72-13262-page6.aspx#startofcomments]. The link is unreliable but the point is to show that she's possibly a hindu rather than a sikh. Most likely she's just a spiritual/humanist kind of person (she says they have a "all gods" alter at home). Just describe it like that in the section. This issue is not worth spending too much time on.
::: Again from now on you need to double check your edits and make sure what you enter is accurately reflected in the source (so you cannot make conclusions that the source does not make explicitly). Wikipedia has a small section on identifying reliable sources that also apply to us in some ways. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Overview]. So for example you can see the publication by IslamKotob is not reliable. thanks. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 21:10, 23 July 2013 (PDT)
::: Again from now on you need to double check your edits and make sure what you enter is accurately reflected in the source (so you cannot make conclusions that the source does not make explicitly). Wikipedia has a small section on identifying reliable sources that also apply to us in some ways. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Overview]. So for example you can see the publication by IslamKotob is not reliable. thanks. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 21:10, 23 July 2013 (PDT)
:::: Agreed with you about the Nafisa Ali. Let's get back to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khusro_Khan Khusro Khan], he should be added on the list. Indeed i don't know why the page wasn't opening with the link that i had added on the edit, but when you go through this one, it's working. Thanks [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 01:55, 24 July 2013 (PDT)
16

edits

Navigation menu