User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 335: Line 335:
== QHS edits ==
== QHS edits ==


Your edit here [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Animals&diff=109254&oldid=109252]. This is Ritual slaughter. It applies to all Abrahamic religions. I agree killing an animal with a knife like this is painful for the animal but the animal's meat is consumed.
Your edit here [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Animals&diff=prev&oldid=109252]. This is Ritual slaughter. It applies to all Abrahamic religions. I agree killing an animal with a knife like this is painful for the animal but the animal's meat is consumed.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sacrifice#Abrahamic_traditions.  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sacrifice#Abrahamic_traditions.  
Line 341: Line 341:
So tell me why those hadiths should stay here and how they fit with the other content of the page.  
So tell me why those hadiths should stay here and how they fit with the other content of the page.  


For the 2nd edit, [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Cosmology&diff=109255&oldid=109253]
For the 2nd edit, [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Cosmology&diff=109253&oldid=109212]


This belongs in Creationism more than it does in Cosmology. Is there anything specific about cosmology mentioned in that quote? Plus this quote has round brackets '(' and you've used double triangular brackets '<'.  
This belongs in Creationism more than it does in Cosmology. Is there anything specific about cosmology mentioned in that quote? Plus this quote has round brackets '(' and you've used double triangular brackets '<'.  


So can you explain? You have a few strikes before I (after consulting with Sahab) ask you to stop all main space editing and keep it in your Sandboxes as I do not have the time to evaluate incorrect edits on an on-going basis, from a regular editor. Unfortunately I do not have the time for this at the moment and this will be the case for a long time. You have had enough time on this website to know that you should evaluate your edits carefully and its like 100% of them have to be evaluated because 50% of them are incorrect and have to be reverted and I'm not able to have that much time. The equivalent of this is having someone work in an office but he's been here for a while and even then 50% of all his tasks are incorrect. Its nice that you contribute but I am not able to evaluate all of this edits like this. I can understand Sahab's desire for quality. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 22:01, 14 August 2014 (PDT)
So can you explain? You have a few strikes before I (after consulting with Sahab) ask you to stop all main space editing and keep it in your Sandboxes as I do not have the time to evaluate incorrect edits on an on-going basis, from a regular editor. Unfortunately I do not have the time for this at the moment and this will be the case for a long time. You have had enough time on this website to know that you should evaluate your edits carefully and its like 100% of them have to be evaluated because 50% of them are incorrect and have to be reverted and I'm not able to have that much time. The equivalent of this is having someone work in an office but he's been here for a while and even then 50% of all his tasks are incorrect. Its nice that you contribute but I am not able to evaluate all of this edits like this. I can understand Sahab's desire for quality. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 22:01, 14 August 2014 (PDT)
Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746

edits

Navigation menu