WikiIslam:Discussions/Visitor Inquiries: Difference between revisions

Line 470: Line 470:
== What about more "responses to apologetics" ? ==
== What about more "responses to apologetics" ? ==


I am writing this as a confused muslim. You know,there are lots of islamic websites,they have thousands of "rebuttals to islamic critics" and just a few anti islamic ones against them.So when muslims come across an argument against islam, they think "well,im sure someone has already refutted this,so lets not worry about it." It seems like that "Critics of islam have all said what is to be said against islam,but apologetics refutted them all,so there is nothing left to say." Probably that is what apologetics think or try to prove.Considering these,I have a suggestion.I think you should have more "responses to apologetics",so that we,as readers,can decide more reasonably which side is more plausible and you can be more "convincing" that way.Thank you.
I am writing this as a confused muslim. You know,there are lots of islamic websites,they have thousands of "rebuttals to islamic critics" and just a few anti islamic ones against them.So when muslims come across an argument against islam, they think "well,im sure someone has already refutted this,so lets not worry about it." It seems like that "Critics of islam have all said what is to be said against islam,but apologists refutted them all,so there is nothing left to say." Probably that is what apologists think or try to prove.Considering these,I have a suggestion.I think you should have more "responses to apologists",so that we,as readers,can decide more reasonably which side is more plausible and you can be more "convincing" that way.Thank you.
Anonymous user