User talk:Sauron: Difference between revisions

User talk:Sauron (view source)

Revision as of 17:47, 21 January 2016

24 bytes added , 21 January 2016

no edit summary

Sauron

58

edits

Revision as of 17:44, 21 January 2016 (view source) Sauron (talk \| contribs) (→‎List of Muhammad's Wives and Concubines) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:47, 21 January 2016 (view source) Sauron (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:People (nonbelievers of Islam in particular because they have no obligation to any sect) cannot fall into the trap of "one sect #1 is valid and everything else is invalid". --[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 20:09, 20 January 2016 (EST)		:People (nonbelievers of Islam in particular because they have no obligation to any sect) cannot fall into the trap of "one sect #1 is valid and everything else is invalid". --[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 20:09, 20 January 2016 (EST)

	Yes i agree that we could use different sects but it would still be better state the affiliation of the author(sect) so that viewers wouldn't just dismiss this website as mumbo jumbo just because there are statements that goes directly with their source/what they consider as valid.		Yes i agree that we could use different sects but it would still be better state the affiliation of the author(sect) so that viewers wouldn't just dismiss this website as mumbo jumbo just because there are statements that goes directly with their source/what they/their sect consider as valid. Btw, thanks.