Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions
→QHS edits
| Line 351: | Line 351: | ||
::::I will also post it to the tasks. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 03:37, 15 August 2014 (PDT) | ::::I will also post it to the tasks. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 03:37, 15 August 2014 (PDT) | ||
::::: The site's quality is the first priority and must be preserved (so it doesn't matter who the boss is - we are all bosses and it depends whose arguments makes sense). I am a nobody too just like you and I will consult with Sahab to decide on this. Looking at it rationally, the problem is that I don't have time to review a regular editor's edits every time. If all of someone's edits require serious evaluation it wouldnt be a problem unless there was someone willing to evaluate the edits who had the time to do it. | ::::: The site's quality is the first priority and must be preserved (so it doesn't matter who the boss is - we are all bosses and it depends whose arguments makes sense). I am a nobody too just like you and I will consult with Sahab to decide on this. Looking at it rationally, the problem is that I don't have time to review a regular editor's edits every time and many of yours edits need to be seriously corrected and require a lot of time for correction. If all of someone's edits require serious evaluation it wouldnt be a problem unless there was someone willing to evaluate the edits who had the time to do it. | ||
:::::''"He did it in large numbers."'' - what large numbers? The hadith only say "many camels". Many camels could be 6, 10, 15, 30 -- we dont know. So what do you mean by large numbers and how do you prove it? If there were a large number of people to feed, 20 camels could be slaughtered and that would be considered "many" or "large numbers". | :::::''"He did it in large numbers."'' - what large numbers? The hadith only say "many camels". Many camels could be 6, 10, 15, 30 -- we dont know. So what do you mean by large numbers and how do you prove it? If there were a large number of people to feed, 20 camels could be slaughtered and that would be considered "many" or "large numbers". | ||
:::::No as I said, the Tafsir quote has nothing specific to creation. ''"Often this cosmology and creation are seen to have some things"'' - this is your interpretation. The Tafsir has nothing about Stars, skies, universe etc. It leaves one wondering what it has to do with cosmology. If creationism is linked we can then copy all the Creation hadiths into Cosmology which doesnt make any sense. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 04:51, 15 August 2014 (PDT) | :::::No as I said, the Tafsir quote has nothing specific to creation. ''"Often this cosmology and creation are seen to have some things"'' - this is your interpretation. The Tafsir has nothing about Stars, skies, universe etc. It leaves one wondering what it has to do with cosmology. If creationism is linked we can then copy all the Creation hadiths into Cosmology which doesnt make any sense. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 04:51, 15 August 2014 (PDT) | ||