User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions

User talk:Saggy (view source)

941 bytes added , 21 May 2014

19,746

edits

@@ Line 182: / Line 182: @@
 ::::I donn't believe in strong or weak in case of refutation. If an error is refuted its not an error till we explain how we are correct. I will try to sort the sections on sc errors.[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 07:42, 22 April 2014 (PDT)
 :::::For some errors its hard to find any justification while others can have some. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:31, 22 April 2014 (PDT)
+== Moon split (wikipedia) ==
+That article is a joke now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_of_the_moon
+Look at this talk page discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Splitting_of_the_moon#Good_article_nomination_on_hold
+They were trying to make it into a good article a long time ago. Now the lead has this:
+:In 2010 a NASA Lunar Science Institute (NLSI) staff scientist said "No current scientific evidence reports that the Moon was split into two (or more) parts and then reassembled at any point in the past."[7]
+And the "NASA" section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_of_the_moon#NASA_mis-cited_as_proof
+I bet now they would like to go the opposite direction and make sure no one sees that article. Anyway, I think its taken care of (for now). --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 21:02, 20 May 2014 (PDT)