User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions

Line 100: Line 100:
::::What if I find more contradictions?[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 03:25, 11 April 2014 (PDT)
::::What if I find more contradictions?[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 03:25, 11 April 2014 (PDT)
:::::Here I've made a page for you that gives you the freedom to do any kind of QHS work (since that is something you like doing). You can reorganize content there using section headings (logical error, hadith errors, contradictions, etc):
:::::Here I've made a page for you that gives you the freedom to do any kind of QHS work (since that is something you like doing). You can reorganize content there using section headings (logical error, hadith errors, contradictions, etc):
:::::[[User:Saggy/Sandbox - Issues with Quran and Hadith]]
:::::[[User:Saggy/Sandbox - Issues with Quran and Hadith]] - use this for any new work or new ideas to keep it in the same place.
:::::Just keep in mind that we can have a democratic discussion together later on as to whether certain content will be approved or not. My view is that interesting QHS can be re-used in other places too in some way so if you have discovered verses or hadiths that are interesting, it is totally OK for them to go in a personal sandbox page of your own. Sandboxes are all excluded from Google search so no one can find them unless they come to recent changes/contributions and explore that way. Doing this does not harm the quality of the main content as sandbox content has to be carefully reviewed to make sure it complies with guidelines and the mission.
:::::You can keep adding content for existing pages as you are doing (Scientific errors in hadith, in the Quran, Contradictions in the Quran etc.) As before we will review those to see if they are ok as that is content in the main space.
:::::Just keep in mind that we can have a democratic discussion together later on as to whether certain content will be approved or not for conversion from sandbox to main space. My view is that interesting QHS can be re-used in other places too in some way so if you have discovered verses or hadiths that are interesting, it is totally OK for them to go in a personal sandbox page of your own. Sandboxes are all excluded from Google search so no one can find them unless they come to recent changes/contributions and explore that way. Doing this does not harm the quality of the main content as sandbox content has to be carefully reviewed to make sure it complies with guidelines and the mission.
:::::Doing a short reply for Sahab, if Quranists want to use content on our site for any purpose, its a good thing. It brings them to our site and they have effectively approved content on our site (I think its a plus for us). They're a minority so I would not worry about them. I can make many more points but my point is that all alternatives can be argued for equally. There are advantages and disadvantages for each alternative.
:::::Doing a short reply for Sahab, if Quranists want to use content on our site for any purpose, its a good thing. It brings them to our site and they have effectively approved content on our site (I think its a plus for us). They're a minority so I would not worry about them. I can make many more points but my point is that all alternatives can be argued for equally. There are advantages and disadvantages for each alternative.
:::::''"you'll see that Muslims have contradictions between the Qur'an and Hadith covered."'' - those are only contradictions for miracles, not other topics. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 04:25, 11 April 2014 (PDT)
:::::''"you'll see that Muslims have contradictions between the Qur'an and Hadith covered."'' - those are only contradictions for miracles, not other topics. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 04:25, 11 April 2014 (PDT)
Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746

edits