User talk:Atheistig: Difference between revisions

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Scientific Errors in the Qur'an==
== Thanks ==


Hi Atheistig and welcome to WikiIslam. You have have made some massive changes to the Scientific Errors in the Qur'an page. These changes include removals and rewrites of entire sections. I would be very grateful if you could provide us with a thorough explanation to the reasons behind them. This is something that is needed before any of these changes can be accepted. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 01:20, 14 November 2013 (PST)
Hi Atheistig. Just a quick thanks for the [[Quran and a Universe from Smoke|Qur'an and a Universe from Smoke]] article that has now been added to the new articles list. It's a great addition to the site. Also liking the Historicity of Muhammad article. I know it's in a very early state, but it looks good. I like the structure. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 03:24, 20 December 2013 (PST)


:Thank you for all the editing!  It's great to have a second set of eyes go over your work and clean it up.  Much appreciated.
--[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 11:49, 21 December 2013 (PST)
:: You're welcome. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 13:24, 21 December 2013 (PST)


Hi Sahabah.  New to wikiislam and not sure if I should be responding to your comment here or on your talk page.  I was making my edits in response to a [[WikiIslam:Tasks#Qur.27an|Task]] to:
== Quran errors ==


{{Quote|Rewrite the sparse commentary on Scientific errors in the Qur'an, getting rid of the poor English, poor attempts at humor and generally unprofessional and arrogant approach}}
Hi Atheistig, you had worked on the Quran errors article and improved it a lot. I'm asking Saggy [[User talk:Atheistig|here]] what he thinks of re-organizing that page so we have more obvious Quran errors at the top and others in another section. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 11:02, 1 February 2014 (PST)


I've tried to improve the clarity of some of the comments including grammar and remove any arrogant or overtly condescending language. I'm also attempting to consolidate similar sections to reduce the size of the outline and put related content and references together.  I did remove a handful of  minor points that were either weaker arguments or completely off topic.  This included Quran references that had no explanation as to why it was an error (and it wasn't readily evident from the text itself) or were weak (i.e "The Sun is not a star" section shows a verse that itemized the sun separately from stars but this doesn't imply the sun is '''not''' a star).  In effect, I'm trying to improve quality over quantity.  There's a ton of information on that article, some of it good some of it bad, and I think improving the good points (including adding reference and refutations to common apologist counter-claims) and removing the bad ones will improve the overall readability and information of that page.  I only updated less than 10% of the article and was hoping to improve other sections as well including rewriting the comments and reorganizing some points (like evolution) to be in the biology section, etc. --[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2013 (PST)
I'm all for reorganizing to have the "better" stuff at the top and maybe the more borderline stuff further down.  Lead with strength!  
:Okay. Thanks for your reply. As a rule, edits by new users have to be checked, but please carry on. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 08:50, 14 November 2013 (PST)
::I would like to add that separate problems such as "Humans created from clay" or "Fall from paradise down to the earth" should keep their headings (although you can alter what exactly those headings are). The reason for this is that each problem should be easy to find via the contents list. Currently I notice that you have removed several headings. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 08:57, 14 November 2013 (PST)
:::Sounds good.  I'll put back some of those separate headings to make them easier to find in the content sectionShould I continue to make all my changes first and then submit them or just submit as I go? I find the later to be easier as my schedule permits. --[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 09:34, 14 November 2013 (PST)
::::Others may try to edit it as you're working on it. So, to get around this, I've created a sandbox and copy/pasted the entire page for you: [[User:Atheistig/Sandbox]]. You can edit that page at your own pace. Once you're finished, let me know and I'll check it then copy/paste the entire thing into the article. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 09:43, 14 November 2013 (PST)


== Historicity of Muhammad ==


Hi Atheistig! Just letting you know that I've moved ''Historicity of Muhammad'' into the mainspace (with an added "under construction" tag). I doubt we'll get many people who will attempt to finish that page, or  at least finish it in a form that would be acceptable. But you never know. I hope you become active again and finish that. Your work here was very good. If not, then I wish you all the best in whatever you do next. Thanks. [[User:Sahab|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 06:45, 12 February 2014 (PST)


Hi Sahahah,
Hi Sahabah,  


I've finished up my changes and improvements to the Scientific Error article that's in my [[User:Atheistig/Sandbox]]Please take check it out.  Thank you.
I do plan to finish it.  Just been really busy at work lately and doing a lot of reading on the historicity of Muhammad.  Once things settle down here at work in the next few weeks, I'll have more time to continue my articles:-)


--[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 15:43, 16 November 2013 (PST)
:That's great news. Really good to know that you're still with us. [[User:Sahab|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 17:29, 12 February 2014 (PST)
:That's great. Thanks! I'll take a look. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 16:45, 16 November 2013 (PST)
::Thanks for all your hard work. I've now copy/pasted it into the actual article. As far as I can tell, it looks great. Really glad you decided to join us. The tone of that article was really bothering me. Hope you decide to stay around. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 17:35, 16 November 2013 (PST)
 
Thanks Sahabah.  I've been doing quite a bit of reading and research on the Alexander the Great / Dhul-Qarnayn story.  I've even found an online google book to A. W. Budge's full translation of the Christian Syriac legend that the Qur'anic story is clearly based upon.  So my immediate next plan is to beef up and significantly expand the [[Dhul-Qarnayn]] article which right now looks like it's mainly a slimmed down, copy-and-paste form the wikipedia article.  I'm also planning on including rebuttals to alternative theories around the identity of Dhul-Qrnanyn and how the connection to the Alexander legend is embarrassing for Muslim scholars today. 
 
After that, I'd like to expand and rework parts of the [[Parallelism Between the Qur'an and Judeo-Christian Scriptures]] set of articles.  I'm hoping we can broaden it to be more like "Qur'an and Judeo-Christian Legends and Myths" or something like that, basically broadening the topic to include other legends and stories beyond what is found in just the Bible and Talmud.  I think that main page for [[Parallelism Between the Qur'an and Judeo-Christian Scriptures]] could be redone to make it more of a summary/link-to-main-article format similar to the [[Science]] page.  Right now it looks kind of like a table of contents.
--[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 12:24, 17 November 2013 (PST)

Latest revision as of 01:29, 13 February 2014

Thanks

Hi Atheistig. Just a quick thanks for the Qur'an and a Universe from Smoke article that has now been added to the new articles list. It's a great addition to the site. Also liking the Historicity of Muhammad article. I know it's in a very early state, but it looks good. I like the structure. --Sahabah (talk) 03:24, 20 December 2013 (PST)

Thank you for all the editing! It's great to have a second set of eyes go over your work and clean it up. Much appreciated.

--Atheistig (talk) 11:49, 21 December 2013 (PST)

You're welcome. --Sahabah (talk) 13:24, 21 December 2013 (PST)

Quran errors

Hi Atheistig, you had worked on the Quran errors article and improved it a lot. I'm asking Saggy here what he thinks of re-organizing that page so we have more obvious Quran errors at the top and others in another section. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this. --Axius (talk) 11:02, 1 February 2014 (PST)

I'm all for reorganizing to have the "better" stuff at the top and maybe the more borderline stuff further down. Lead with strength!

Historicity of Muhammad

Hi Atheistig! Just letting you know that I've moved Historicity of Muhammad into the mainspace (with an added "under construction" tag). I doubt we'll get many people who will attempt to finish that page, or at least finish it in a form that would be acceptable. But you never know. I hope you become active again and finish that. Your work here was very good. If not, then I wish you all the best in whatever you do next. Thanks. --Sahabah (talk) 06:45, 12 February 2014 (PST)

Hi Sahabah,

I do plan to finish it. Just been really busy at work lately and doing a lot of reading on the historicity of Muhammad. Once things settle down here at work in the next few weeks, I'll have more time to continue my articles.  :-)

That's great news. Really good to know that you're still with us. --Sahabah (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2014 (PST)