Page history

CPO675

→‎Verses that have no meaning and/or make no sense: Added another confusing set of verses

CPO675

→‎Verses that have no meaning and/or make no sense: I have added another verse that needs extra-qur'anic material to make sense.

CPO675

→‎Verses that have no meaning and/or make no sense

Asmith

→‎Sunni-Shia Split

CPO675

→‎Sunni-Shia Split: Added in a section on Abrogation being impossible without extra traditions

Asmith

→‎Versus that have no meaning and/or make no sense: versus->verses

CPO675

→‎Versus that have no meaning: Added one more verse to this section.

CPO675

→‎Sunni-Shia Split: Have added a section on issues with versus having no or unknown meaning without extra-Quranic material.

Asmith

→‎Problems with Quranism

Asmith

→‎Problems with Quranism

Asmith

→‎Problems with Quranism: editing language to be encyclopedic

Asmith

→‎Why it is not possible

Asmith

→‎Rejected as Apostates

Asmith

→‎Rejected as Apostates

CPO675

→‎Five Pillars of Islam: I have added in some more scholarly information and citations on this topic, and changed some of the more polemical language to be more balanced which I will continue to review. And I've added a small section on the Sunni-shia as nothing on electing religious leaders is in the Quran.

CPO675

→‎Five Pillars of Islam: Added in a (very) small section on issues with Quranism referencing characters that are introduced without explaining who they are, or in the case of Abu Lahab, what they did to be condemned etc, that require secondary literature to explain.

Lightyears

Rejected the last text change (by CPO675) and restored revision 137502 by Lightyears: It seems much to tenuous to apply the verse in that sense.

CPO675

→‎Criticism of hadiths: Added a sentence on the hadith existence seemingly contradicting the Qur'an itself.

Lightyears

no edit summary

CPO675

→‎Criticisms: I have turned the title of the previous upload 'Criticisms' to a new section 'Further Criticisms' to take it out of the 'Five Pillars' section of the page.

CPO675

→‎Why it is not possible: I have added a new section covering criticism of having the 'secondary' revelations needed to understand the Qur'an leading to problems in interpreting it. As well as a brief explanation of isnads which I felt was missing on this page, and their dubious value only being used after 700AD.

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

→‎See Also

IbnPinker

→‎Conclusion

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

Asmith

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

IbnPinker

IbnPinker moved page Qur'an Only Islam - Why it is Not Possible to Quranism

IbnPinker

no edit summary

Tharpa

→‎Conclusion: I have restored the change (without the explanation) that Sahab erroneously reverted. The comparison in the article was invalid. The earlier comparison I had was accurate but, as we saw, potentially confusing.

Asmith

no edit summary

Asmith

no edit summary

IbnPinker

no edit summary

Prekladator

no edit summary

Axius

no edit summary

Sahab

reverting Tharpa's edit. the edit and the summary don't seem to match (besides the fact that the actual edit makes no sense

Tharpa

→‎Conclusion: Corrected an overstated sentence. Buddhism without the Buddha would be like Islam without Mohammed, or maybe even Allah.

Sahab

no edit summary

Sahab

no edit summary

Sahab

→‎Qur'an only Islam

Sahab

no edit summary

Sahab

no edit summary