4,547
edits
Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Stoning: Difference between revisions
Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Stoning (view source)
Revision as of 22:28, 10 September 2022
, 10 September 2022no edit summary
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
===Shaykh Gibril Haddad=== | ===Shaykh Gibril Haddad=== | ||
{{Quote|[http://mac.abc.se/home/onesr/ez/in/it1/Abrogation_Hadith.txt Abrogation and Hadith | {{Quote|[https://web.archive.org/web/20110105134214/http://mac.abc.se/home/onesr/ez/in/it1/Abrogation_Hadith.txt Abrogation and Hadith Shaykh Gibril Fouad Haddad, Living Islam, December 23, 2008]|The late Shaykh `Abd Allah al-Ghumari in Dhawq al-Halawa fi Imtina` Naskh al-Tilawa and al-Ihsan fi Ta`qib al-Itqan, denied that "When the mature man and the mature woman commit adultery, stone them" was ever part of the Qur'an and asserted the report to that effect was disclaimed (munkar). However, '''it cannot be munkar since Imam Malik narrates it verbatim from our liegelord `Umar in the chapter on hadd in the Muwatta''''.<BR>. . .<BR> | ||
Yes, our liegelord `Umar radyAllahu `anhu reported that when it was revealed, the Prophet salla Allahu `alayhi wa-Sallam refrained from consigning it into writing, so it did not become mass-transmitted from him. (If it had, it would have been meaningless for `Umar to strenuously predict that innovators would one day emerge and deny that rajm was ever in the Qur'an.) | Yes, our liegelord `Umar radyAllahu `anhu reported that when it was revealed, the Prophet salla Allahu `alayhi wa-Sallam refrained from consigning it into writing, so it did not become mass-transmitted from him. (If it had, it would have been meaningless for `Umar to strenuously predict that innovators would one day emerge and deny that rajm was ever in the Qur'an.) | ||