Man and woman word count in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions

[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Line 477: Line 477:
* Miracle 1: "''The word rajul (man) and the word amra (woman) are both mentioned 24 times. That is a miracle and it means men and women are equal.''"<ref>http://www.islamawareness.net/Miq/stat.html</ref><ref>http://www.answering-christianity.com/equality_men_women.htm</ref>
* Miracle 1: "''The word rajul (man) and the word amra (woman) are both mentioned 24 times. That is a miracle and it means men and women are equal.''"<ref>http://www.islamawareness.net/Miq/stat.html</ref><ref>http://www.answering-christianity.com/equality_men_women.htm</ref>
** The word count 24 is achieved by ignoring all dual and plural forms.
** The word count 24 is achieved by ignoring all dual and plural forms.
** Forms with suffixes and prefixes are suddenly counted although in the 365 days miracle, they were not counted.
** Forms with suffixes and prefixes are suddenly counted although in the [[365 days miracle in the Quran|365 days miracle]], they were not counted.
** All the words meaning "man" with the root امر are ignored.
** All the words meaning "man" with the root امر are ignored.
** This word count includes the controversial word (رَجُلًا, rajulan) from the verse 7:155, which is in the singular form, but is clearly talking about ''seventy men'' (سَبْعِينَ رَجُلًا, ''sabAAeena rajulan''). Wouldn't it be more logical to count it as plural?
** This word count includes the controversial word (رَجُلًا, rajulan) from the verse 7:155, which is in the singular form, but is clearly talking about ''seventy men'' (سَبْعِينَ رَجُلًا, ''sabAAeena rajulan''). Wouldn't it be more logical to count it as plural?
Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744

edits