12
edits
User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions
→Scientific errors - response blog
| Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
:::''I think it is more in relation to you guys realising how weak and lack luster many of the points were on that article.'' | :::''I think it is more in relation to you guys realising how weak and lack luster many of the points were on that article.'' | ||
::Again its a work in progress like any other page and we try to make all the content stronger with time and the reason for that revision can be scrutiny/afterthought that we have ourselves or that closer look may come from outside. Some errors are more obvious than others (this is expected). This dialogue can help us strengthen our page. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 18:12, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | ::Again its a work in progress like any other page and we try to make all the content stronger with time and the reason for that revision can be scrutiny/afterthought that we have ourselves or that closer look may come from outside. Some errors are more obvious than others (this is expected). This dialogue can help us strengthen our page. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 18:12, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
:: No this is good. And I commend you for going through the articles and rewriting them. | |||
== Reviews == | == Reviews == | ||