User talk:Lightyears: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


:For Crone's article you currently only have a short version of the reference. This seems to be unintentional as your first revision on 10 September removed what was the full reference from your initial comments. It would be better to have the more complete version of the Crone reference for your page update. Similarly, for Tesei's article it's great to link the freely accessible academia copy but as well as giving the full reference. An example of a better format is the Tesei reference in the [[Prophecies in the Quran]] article.  
:For Crone's article you currently only have a short version of the reference. This seems to be unintentional as your first revision on 10 September removed what was the full reference from your initial comments. It would be better to have the more complete version of the Crone reference for your page update. Similarly, for Tesei's article it's great to link the freely accessible academia copy but as well as giving the full reference. An example of a better format is the Tesei reference in the [[Prophecies in the Quran]] article.  
Lightyears
I've updated the main article.  I'm not sure whether it's public yet. When it is I'll delete the sandbox material to avoid confusion.


:Also, feel free to add the points you mentioned on the historical attestation of Muhammad talk page, though it should also be mentioned clearly that Ohlig is considered part of the Revisionist school of thought in Islamic studies, specifically the Inârah Institute who are considered a fringe group by other academic scholars. It looks like there is an intention to flesh out the empty sections at some point but it's fine to make those changes now. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 14:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
:Also, feel free to add the points you mentioned on the historical attestation of Muhammad talk page, though it should also be mentioned clearly that Ohlig is considered part of the Revisionist school of thought in Islamic studies, specifically the Inârah Institute who are considered a fringe group by other academic scholars. It looks like there is an intention to flesh out the empty sections at some point but it's fine to make those changes now. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 14:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Line 37: Line 40:
I've made some more changes.  Would it be possible to finalise the whole thing now?  I've asked some questions, and other readers may have the answers.
I've made some more changes.  Would it be possible to finalise the whole thing now?  I've asked some questions, and other readers may have the answers.
:Sure, you can go ahead and add your work into the Mecca article itself. At some point we will add some further content/edits. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 00:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
:Sure, you can go ahead and add your work into the Mecca article itself. At some point we will add some further content/edits. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 00:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
== Hello, are you currently reviewing updates please? ==
Hey Lightyears - I hope you are well and have had a great holiday period! You've previously reviewed and accepted/edited many of my updates (and on the shooting stars page) - I was just checking if they were still coming through okay, as some have been here for about a month? Or if you're taking a break just let me know and I'll reach out to another editior.  Cheers, CPO675
:Hi, due to external events recently I have had to concentrate on other things and have been unable to look at the wiki. Possibly that may change quite soon but otherwise ASmith should be able to help. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 23:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay no worries thank you! Will do (Y)
== Article of smoke ==
Hello i see that on the article of smoke someone said that hot gas should have been the word to describe the universe but there was no word for gas in 7th century Arabic if you could re-edit it or tell me another word that would have been better for it then that would be much appreciated [[User:Syegod101|Syegod101]] ([[User talk:Syegod101|talk]]) 05:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello? How come i dint get no responses? [[User:Syegod101|Syegod101]] ([[User talk:Syegod101|talk]]) 19:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, apologies. The people you contacted are rarely active these days and probably didn't see your messages. The gas mistake which you mention has actually been on my list of things to fix since last year and I will likely fix it soon. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 22:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
== Publishing problem ==
Hello,
I am Damaskin, I am the administrator of the Bulgarian version.
I am sending you this because it has not allowed me to publish on Facebook recently (the last two articles), and I think it is very important. No one can publish them - the post freezes and nothing happens. It says - just a moment...
After talking to those who know the subject, the problem should be in site.
Best regards,
Damaskin
232

edits