4,794
edits
Conquest of Khaybar: Difference between revisions
→Modern Views and Perspectives
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
==Modern Views and Perspectives== | ==Modern Views and Perspectives== | ||
The battle of Khaybar was viewed at the time of the writing and collecting of the [[sirah]] and [[hadith]] literature as am umabashed triump of the prophet and Islam over the Jews and unbelief (kufr) in general. The Islamic literature took great pride in recounting the defeat of the Jews, the seizure of their property, the discovry of the treasure of [[Kinana]], his torture, the taking of his wife [[Safiyya]] by Muhammad, and the reduction of the Jews of Khaybar to [[dhimmitude]]. The narrative of Khaybar served as a template for the Muslims when dealing with Christian enemies in terms of governance, booty, and terms of surrender. | |||
Modern Muslims and Arab nationalists, when facing the state of Israel in battle, have often invoked the memory of Khaybar to encourage their people to fight the Jews. Muslims around the world have repeated to chant "Khaybar, Khaybar ya yahud, jaysh Muhammad saya'ud" "Khaybar, Khaybar oh Jews, the army of Muhammad shall return." Modern Jews have described such invocations as manifestations of [[anti-Semetism]], while liberal Muslims have cast doubt on this and many other sirah and hadith narratives, using the Qur'an as a template for more convivial inter-faith relations than those portrayed in the sirah-maghazi literature. | |||
==Problems with the Traditional Narrative== | ==Problems with the Traditional Narrative== | ||