34
edits
Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad (view source)
Revision as of 14:57, 14 April 2018
, 14 April 2018clarification
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Guillotino (talk | contribs) (→Sins: God ---> Allah wrt our policies) |
(clarification) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
====Sins==== | ====Sins==== | ||
" | "Major" or "grave" sins include: | ||
*Slaughtering an animal in any other name than Allah’s | *Slaughtering an animal in any other name than Allah’s | ||
*Cursing one’s parents | *Cursing one’s parents | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
*engaging in tyranny, oppression, or injustice; | *engaging in tyranny, oppression, or injustice; | ||
*permitting dishonest sales, contracts, purchases, measures, or weights.<ref name="DLB2004: 78">[[#DLB2004|DeLong-Bas, ''Wahhabi Islam'', 2004]]: 78</ref> | *permitting dishonest sales, contracts, purchases, measures, or weights.<ref name="DLB2004: 78">[[#DLB2004|DeLong-Bas, ''Wahhabi Islam'', 2004]]: 78</ref> | ||
;Analysis | |||
*Governments necessarily need to hide some things from citizens. They also cannot give perfect justice. Injustice to someone or something is inevitable. In setting the above blanket rules for Islamic governments, Wahhab and DeLong-Bas have justified totalitarianism in a subtle form. If a government fails to stick to the above rules what will the people do to it? What will the neighboring Islamic country do? What should the militants do? We leave the answers as a guess to the reader. | |||
*Why is sorcery a grave sin? Sorcery has no basis in science; according to Muslims themselves, Allah and Quran are in complete compatibility with science. Is Allah scared of sorcery? | |||
====Faith, good actions and excusing unbelief==== | ====Faith, good actions and excusing unbelief==== | ||
| Line 214: | Line 218: | ||
;Clothing | ;Clothing | ||
Belying "the extremist misogynist he is often made out to be," IAW responded to a picayune question about "some minute details of women's dress" with a fatwa not spelling out dress regulations, but simply stating "that clothing and maintaining the wife are the responsibility of the husband, and ended the discussion. Thus it is left to the husband, rather than an external party to decide how his wife ought to dress."<ref name="DLB2004: 157-8">[[#DLB2004|DeLong-Bas, ''Wahhabi Islam'', 2004]]: 157-8</ref> | Belying "the extremist misogynist he is often made out to be," IAW responded to a picayune question about "some minute details of women's dress" with a fatwa not spelling out dress regulations, but simply stating "that clothing and maintaining the wife are the responsibility of the husband, and ended the discussion. Thus it is left to the husband, rather than an external party" (or the wife herself) "to decide how his wife ought to dress."<ref name="DLB2004: 157-8">[[#DLB2004|DeLong-Bas, ''Wahhabi Islam'', 2004]]: 157-8</ref> | ||
;Mahr | ;Mahr | ||