em-bypass-2
1,979
edits
User talk:Lightyears: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Criticisms
Lightyears (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
:They give such rights very sparingly based on their trust in the person's decisions and consistent quality of their edits, their arguments, their judgement on whether something is significant enough to warrant lengthening a page etc. The reasons they were not comfortable with you having full editor rights to make changes without review would thus be apparent in any previous discussions or disagreements you'd had with admin in the past, even though many of your contributions were welcome following review. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 11:41, 27 February 2017 (EST) | :They give such rights very sparingly based on their trust in the person's decisions and consistent quality of their edits, their arguments, their judgement on whether something is significant enough to warrant lengthening a page etc. The reasons they were not comfortable with you having full editor rights to make changes without review would thus be apparent in any previous discussions or disagreements you'd had with admin in the past, even though many of your contributions were welcome following review. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 11:41, 27 February 2017 (EST) | ||
==Criticisms== | |||
I still wonder where exactly do Muslims criticize this Wiki (in English at least). Their pages are not easily googleable, which itself makes them hard to spot. Can you add some links of those critics in a page here? so that I can see what scientific errors/other erors they are refuting and how. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 08:03, 21 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
:I just happened to see a thread on the reddit Islam sub. I then did a search of their sub and looked through the comments of similar threads on the first page of results, so I soon had a small list of things to sort out. There's no doubt that there are lots of poor pieces of content here and they tend to point out the worst ones they find, so it's a good way to find high priority things that need fixing. As for scientific errors, the weak stuff is pretty much gone now. Hardly any valid, specific criticisms of the page are mentioned by Muslims, which are weaknesses I was aware of but hadn't bothered to change til now. Different people mention the same things after they seem to have scrolled a long way down the page, so these days it seems that they find it pretty hard to come up with significant criticisms of it. In one thread from a few months ago a guy decided not to convert because of that page.[[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 10:02, 21 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
::You mean decided not to convert to Islam? [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 10:28, 21 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
:::Correct, he came close to converting, but saw on the page that there's no way the Qur'an could be divine.[[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 11:39, 21 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
::::That reminds me, we should restart the apostate testimonies. still locked i guess. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 15:27, 21 April 2017 (EDT) | |||