Page history
11 September 2016
→The visibility of the sun's movement
−39
→The visibility of the sun's movement: Further explanation regarding 31.29 and better wording
+210
→Conclusion
+1
→Primary Evidence: Added to the primary evidence list the 2 main things from the improved shape of the sun's orbit section.
+212
→The shape of the sun's course: lexicon link for 2:258
+351
Moved shape of sun's course section further up now that it's been improved
+1
→The shape of the sun's course
m−48
→The shape of the sun's course: Shortened this section, replacing some full quotes with verse citations + extra detail on 2:258
−1,852
→Primary Evidence
m−1
→Primary Evidence: clearer wording
+168
→The visibility of the sun's movement
+9
→Primary Evidence
−82
18 August 2016
Consolidated the two galactic orbit refutations into the same section, and removed duplicate quote of 25:45
+16
Moved nearer to the beginning the section on 75:8-9 as it is so significant and goes well with the next section
→Primary Evidence: correction regarding stars, and removed the verse citations that do not demonstrate a fixed heavens (see also scientific errors page talk re 35:41), which are not needed for this topic anyway
−315
4 March 2016
→The visibility of the sun's movement: Changed to Sahih Intl translation, which as is so often the case, is most accurate. The sentence parsing is important to leave no doubt.
+39
→The course of the sun in relation to the course of the moon: Note that 36:37 gives more proof that the sun's movement is supposed to be visible
+143
→Primary Evidence: I always tend to feel that "orbit" lends an undeserved air of scientific credibility to the Qur'an, so just a little note on that as falak can mean semi circle
+55
→Primary Evidence: Maybe contentious, but the hadiths and scientist only appear right at the end in a minor role so I've removed the preamble, which is partly duplicated there anyway. Better to shorten, get right into it before the reader gets bored.
−1,004
→The movement of the sun and timekeeping: Made explicit the connection with previous section. Shortened article by removing the full prayer time quotes as adds little, instead added their verse numbers to salat list.
−683
→The visibility of the sun's movement
m→The visibility of the sun's movement: merged the 13.2 stuff into here as per above, reducing duplication and the length of the article.
+281
→The sun and moon are signs from Allah: Removed the part about 13:2, because it is already in the next section too where it is even more relevant. I'll partly merge those comments into there.
−946
→The regular cycle of the sun: directing reader to notes above about the word 'resting place'
+119
→Conclusion: added a couple of the main points to conclusion
+180
→Primary Evidence: removed endnote re the word follows as per previous edit note as it now appears later
−693
→The course of the sun in relation to the course of the moon
m→The course of the sun in relation to the course of the moon: The Arabic point re the word follows is a major evidence, so moved to here. I'll remove from endnotes where it had earlier been put in an effort to shorten the primary evidence list.
+707
→The regular cycle of the sun: 'prevents' is not an accurate word given the Arabic. 'Not for' or 'not fitting' is more accurate.
−10
→The visibility of the sun's movement: Added the milky way point which this section is crucial in debunking. Also removed an unnoticed apologetic addition.
−133
→Primary Evidence: List was missing 2 major points, so slightly expanded a couple of existing points to include them.
+224
31 January 2016
Reverted edits by 46.185.189.71 (talk) to last revision by 139.162.212.103
m−402
→Introduction
+264
→Introduction
+138
19 January 2016
19 February 2015
Reverted edits by 199.126.130.75 (talk) to last revision by Sahab
m+1,292
→The visibility of the sun's movement
−325
→Primary Evidence
−967
9 October 2014
→Primary Evidence
m+20
→The course of the sun in relation to the course of the moon
m+2
no edit summary
m+4
no edit summary
m+1
→Primary Evidence
m−4
→Primary Evidence
m+576
I'm putting a lot of Lightyears' additions into footnotes. that is where they belong, otherwise an easy to read article becomes extremely broken and difficult for the average reader to digest
m−90